GWLLF
Price
$1.78
Change
+$0.04 (+2.30%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
XPNGF
Price
$6.58
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Ad is loading...

GWLLF vs XPNGF

Header iconGWLLF vs XPNGF Comparison
Open Charts GWLLF vs XPNGFBanner chart's image
Great Wall Motor
Price$1.78
Change+$0.04 (+2.30%)
Volume$12.51K
CapitalizationN/A
XPeng
Price$6.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
GWLLF vs XPNGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GWLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XPNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GWLLF vs. XPNGF commentary
Dec 25, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GWLLF is a StrongBuy and XPNGF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2024
Stock price -- (GWLLF: $1.78 vs. XPNGF: $6.58)
Brand notoriety: GWLLF and XPNGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GWLLF: 223% vs. XPNGF: 17%
Market capitalization -- GWLLF: $28.8B vs. XPNGF: $19.26B
GWLLF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $28.8B. XPNGF’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $19.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $33.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GWLLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileXPNGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GWLLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • XPNGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GWLLF is a better buy in the long-term than XPNGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GWLLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XPNGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GWLLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • XPNGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GWLLF is a better buy in the short-term than XPNGF.

Price Growth

GWLLF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +2.30% price change this week, while XPNGF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.40%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+0.46% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GWLLF($28.8B) has a higher market cap than XPNGF($19.3B). GWLLF YTD gains are higher at: 43.548 vs. XPNGF (-4.082). GWLLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.79B vs. XPNGF (-9.58B). GWLLF has more cash in the bank: 26.7B vs. XPNGF (23.7B). XPNGF has less debt than GWLLF: XPNGF (12.6B) vs GWLLF (29.3B). GWLLF has higher revenues than XPNGF: GWLLF (133B) vs XPNGF (23.4B).
GWLLFXPNGFGWLLF / XPNGF
Capitalization28.8B19.3B149%
EBITDA7.79B-9.58B-81%
Gain YTD43.548-4.082-1,067%
P/E Ratio12.71N/A-
Revenue133B23.4B568%
Total Cash26.7B23.7B113%
Total Debt29.3B12.6B233%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GWLLF: Fundamental Ratings
GWLLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
30
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71
SMR RATING
1..100
18
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GWLLFXPNGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GWLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XPNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSVO21.710.22
+1.02%
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF
IEDI54.620.52
+0.96%
iShares U.S. Consumer Focused ETF
AUSF42.550.30
+0.72%
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF
CADNZD1.23N/A
N/A
Canadian Dollar - New Zealand Dollar
FLKR18.00-0.05
-0.28%
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF

GWLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GWLLF and XPNGF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GWLLF and XPNGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GWLLF
1D Price
Change %
GWLLF100%
+2.05%
XPNGF - GWLLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XPEV - GWLLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
LI - GWLLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
FUJHF - GWLLF
16%
Poorly correlated
+4.93%
GNZUF - GWLLF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.93%
More

XPNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XPNGF and DNFGF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XPNGF and DNFGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XPNGF
1D Price
Change %
XPNGF100%
N/A
DNFGF - XPNGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GELYY - XPNGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
GWLLF - XPNGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
XPEV - XPNGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
RIVN - XPNGF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
More