Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GWMTX vs RLVSX
GWMTX vs RLVSX Comparison
Open Charts GWMTX vs RLVSX
AMG GW&K Municipal Bond N
Price$11.39
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets942.96M
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond S
Price$21.90
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.1B
GWMTX vs RLVSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GWMTX vs. RLVSX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GWMTX is a Hold and RLVSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLVSX has more cash in the bank: 6.1B vs. GWMTX (943M). RLVSX pays higher dividends than GWMTX: RLVSX (3.63) vs GWMTX (2.56). GWMTX was incepted earlier than RLVSX: GWMTX (16 years) vs RLVSX (40 years). GWMTX (0.78) is less costly to investors than RLVSX (0.57). RLVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GWMTX (36.00). RLVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GWMTX: RLVSX (0) vs GWMTX (2000). RLVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.19 vs. GWMTX (1.59). RLVSX return over 5 years is better than : 1.27 vs. GWMTX (-1.01).
| GWMTX | RLVSX | GWMTX / RLVSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.51 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.57 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.023 | 2.963 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 943M | 6.1B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 3.63 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.59 | 2.19 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.09 | 11.55 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.01 | 1.27 | -80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.52 | 4.40 | 284% |