Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GWMTX vs RTEAX
GWMTX vs RTEAX Comparison
Open Charts GWMTX vs RTEAX
AMG GW&K Municipal Bond N
Price$11.50
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets955M
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond A
Price$22.08
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.17B
GWMTX vs RTEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GWMTX vs. RTEAX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GWMTX is a Hold and RTEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTEAX has more cash in the bank: 6.17B vs. GWMTX (955M). RTEAX pays higher dividends than GWMTX: RTEAX (3.31) vs GWMTX (2.52). GWMTX was incepted earlier than RTEAX: GWMTX (16 years) vs RTEAX (15 years). RTEAX (0.82) and GWMTX (0.78) have similar cost to investors . RTEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GWMTX (36.00). RTEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GWMTX: RTEAX (0) vs GWMTX (2000). GWMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.31 vs. RTEAX (2.58). RTEAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.70 vs. GWMTX (0.64).
| GWMTX | RTEAX | GWMTX / RTEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.80 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.82 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.245 | 3.457 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 955M | 6.17B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.52 | 3.31 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.31 | 2.58 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.42 | 14.27 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.64 | 1.70 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.58 | 3.96 | 317% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement