Ad is loading...
GWMTX vs RTEAX
GWMTX vs RTEAX Comparison
Open Charts GWMTX vs RTEAX
AMG GW&K Municipal Bond N
Price$11.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets991.05M
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond A
Price$21.79
Change-$0.06 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.89B
GWMTX vs RTEAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GWMTX vs. RTEAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GWMTX is a Hold and RTEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTEAX has more cash in the bank: 5.89B vs. GWMTX (991M). RTEAX pays higher dividends than GWMTX: RTEAX (3.25) vs GWMTX (2.39). GWMTX was incepted earlier than RTEAX: GWMTX (16 years) vs RTEAX (15 years). RTEAX (0.82) and GWMTX (0.79) have similar cost to investors . RTEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GWMTX (29.00). RTEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GWMTX: RTEAX (0) vs GWMTX (2000). RTEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.01 vs. GWMTX (1.03). RTEAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.60 vs. GWMTX (1.24).
| GWMTX | RTEAX | GWMTX / RTEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.80 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.82 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.011 | 0.174 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 991M | 5.89B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.39 | 3.25 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.03 | 2.01 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.90 | 2.78 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.24 | 2.60 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.05 | 0.14 | 6,250% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...