Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GWMTX vs RTEAX
GWMTX vs RTEAX Comparison
Open Charts GWMTX vs RTEAX
AMG GW&K Municipal Bond N
Price$11.39
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets942.96M
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond A
Price$21.99
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.1B
GWMTX vs RTEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GWMTX vs. RTEAX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GWMTX is a Hold and RTEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTEAX has more cash in the bank: 6.1B vs. GWMTX (943M). RTEAX pays higher dividends than GWMTX: RTEAX (3.32) vs GWMTX (2.56). GWMTX was incepted earlier than RTEAX: GWMTX (16 years) vs RTEAX (15 years). RTEAX (0.82) and GWMTX (0.78) have similar cost to investors . RTEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GWMTX (36.00). RTEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GWMTX: RTEAX (0) vs GWMTX (2000). RTEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.89 vs. GWMTX (1.59). RTEAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.51 vs. GWMTX (-1.01).
| GWMTX | RTEAX | GWMTX / RTEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.80 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.82 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.023 | 2.761 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 943M | 6.1B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 3.32 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.59 | 1.89 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.09 | 10.72 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.01 | 0.51 | -200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.52 | 3.89 | 322% |