It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GWOX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXLMDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GWOX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XLMDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
GWOX (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а -7.78% price change this week, while XLMDF (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was +1.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.56%.
The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
GWOX | XLMDF | GWOX / XLMDF | |
Capitalization | 36M | 36.3M | 99% |
EBITDA | 24M | 11.5M | 209% |
Gain YTD | -1.190 | 12.500 | -10% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 15.65 | - |
Revenue | 24M | 66.5M | 36% |
Total Cash | N/A | 24.6M | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 1.55M | - |
GWOX | XLMDF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GWOX's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XLMDF (68). This means that GWOX’s stock grew somewhat faster than XLMDF’s over the last 12 months.
GWOX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as XLMDF (100). This means that GWOX’s stock grew similarly to XLMDF’s over the last 12 months.
XLMDF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as GWOX (100). This means that XLMDF’s stock grew similarly to GWOX’s over the last 12 months.
XLMDF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as GWOX (52). This means that XLMDF’s stock grew similarly to GWOX’s over the last 12 months.
XLMDF's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as GWOX (100). This means that XLMDF’s stock grew similarly to GWOX’s over the last 12 months.
GWOX | XLMDF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 12 days ago35% | 12 days ago64% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago55% | 12 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago40% | 12 days ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago41% | 12 days ago69% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago60% | 13 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 25 days ago72% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago36% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
VWID | 26.93 | 0.12 | +0.46% |
Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF | |||
EWT | 52.03 | 0.05 | +0.10% |
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | |||
YSEP | 21.93 | 0.01 | +0.07% |
FT Vest Intl Eq Mod Bfr ETF Sep | |||
GSST | 50.38 | 0.03 | +0.06% |
Goldman Sachs Access Ultra Short Bd ETF | |||
PFIX | 53.74 | -0.46 | -0.85% |
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GWOX and IFPJF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GWOX and IFPJF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GWOX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GWOX | 100% | -5.03% | ||
IFPJF - GWOX | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SBSNY - GWOX | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.98% | ||
XLMDF - GWOX | 3% Poorly correlated | -4.81% | ||
DTRL - GWOX | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
IFJPY - GWOX | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.24% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that XLMDF and GWOX have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XLMDF and GWOX's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLMDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
XLMDF | 100% | -4.81% | ||
GWOX - XLMDF | 3% Poorly correlated | -5.03% | ||
RZSMF - XLMDF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
IFJPY - XLMDF | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.24% | ||
STRYF - XLMDF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SBSNY - XLMDF | -1% Poorly correlated | -1.98% | ||
More |