Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GWPDX vs TFAFX
GWPDX vs TFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GWPDX vs. TFAFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GWPDX is a Hold and TFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GWPDX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. TFAFX (37.1M). GWPDX pays higher dividends than TFAFX: GWPDX (0.64) vs TFAFX (0.00). GWPDX was incepted earlier than TFAFX: GWPDX (9 years) vs TFAFX (6 years). TFAFX (2.91) is less costly to investors than GWPDX (0.38). TFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GWPDX: TFAFX (250) vs GWPDX (1000000). GWPDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.54 vs. TFAFX (8.72). GWPDX return over 5 years is better than : 34.50 vs. TFAFX (17.60).
| GWPDX | TFAFX | GWPDX / TFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 2.64 | 14% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 2.91 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.665 | 8.441 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 37.1M | 65,229% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.54 | 8.72 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.33 | 45.32 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.50 | 17.60 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |