Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GWPDX vs TFAFX
GWPDX vs TFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GWPDX vs. TFAFX commentary
Jun 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GWPDX is a Hold and TFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GWPDX has more cash in the bank: 21.9B vs. TFAFX (34.1M). GWPDX pays higher dividends than TFAFX: GWPDX (0.74) vs TFAFX (0.00). GWPDX was incepted earlier than TFAFX: GWPDX (8 years) vs TFAFX (6 years). TFAFX (2.91) is less costly to investors than GWPDX (0.38). TFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GWPDX: TFAFX (250) vs GWPDX (1000000). GWPDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.92 vs. TFAFX (4.56). GWPDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.74 vs. TFAFX (16.85).
| GWPDX | TFAFX | GWPDX / TFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 2.64 | 14% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 2.91 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.418 | -1.292 | -419% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.9B | 34.1M | 64,223% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.92 | 4.56 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.19 | 33.67 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.74 | 16.85 | 260% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement