GXRFF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
11M
TNEYF
Price
$3.88
Change
-$0.05 (-1.27%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.94B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GXRFF vs TNEYF

Header iconGXRFF vs TNEYF Comparison
Open Charts GXRFF vs TNEYFBanner chart's image
Prospera Energy
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$24K
Capitalization11M
Tamarack Valley Energy
Price$3.88
Change-$0.05 (-1.27%)
Volume$13.5K
Capitalization1.94B
GXRFF vs TNEYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GXRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TNEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GXRFF vs. TNEYF commentary
Aug 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GXRFF is a StrongBuy and TNEYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GXRFF: $0.02 vs. TNEYF: $3.88)
Brand notoriety: GXRFF and TNEYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GXRFF: 30% vs. TNEYF: 58%
Market capitalization -- GXRFF: $11M vs. TNEYF: $1.94B
GXRFF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $11M. TNEYF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $1.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $121.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GXRFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTNEYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GXRFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TNEYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TNEYF is a better buy in the long-term than GXRFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GXRFF’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNEYF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GXRFF’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TNEYF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GXRFF is a better buy in the short-term than TNEYF.

Price Growth

GXRFF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -2.04% price change this week, while TNEYF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +1.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +3.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+3.01% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNEYF($1.94B) has a higher market cap than GXRFF($11M). GXRFF YTD gains are higher at: 32.597 vs. TNEYF (16.517). TNEYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 983M vs. GXRFF (1.47M). TNEYF has more cash in the bank: 2.76M vs. GXRFF (145K). GXRFF has less debt than TNEYF: GXRFF (22.8M) vs TNEYF (748M). TNEYF has higher revenues than GXRFF: TNEYF (1.74B) vs GXRFF (18.8M).
GXRFFTNEYFGXRFF / TNEYF
Capitalization11M1.94B1%
EBITDA1.47M983M0%
Gain YTD32.59716.517197%
P/E RatioN/A11.18-
Revenue18.8M1.74B1%
Total Cash145K2.76M5%
Total Debt22.8M748M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GXRFF vs TNEYF: Fundamental Ratings
GXRFF
TNEYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2983
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8943
SMR RATING
1..100
10064
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3090
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TNEYF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GXRFF (91). This means that TNEYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GXRFF’s over the last 12 months.

TNEYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GXRFF (89). This means that TNEYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GXRFF’s over the last 12 months.

TNEYF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GXRFF (100). This means that TNEYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GXRFF’s over the last 12 months.

TNEYF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as GXRFF (55). This means that TNEYF’s stock grew similarly to GXRFF’s over the last 12 months.

GXRFF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TNEYF (90). This means that GXRFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TNEYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GXRFFTNEYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GXRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TNEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRPWX23.23N/A
N/A
Nuveen Quant Mid Cap Growth R6
QABGX23.24N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
BLPIX78.62N/A
N/A
ProFunds Bull Inv
TAMVX32.70N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Adv
CSVZX39.37N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Inst

GXRFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GXRFF and PTALF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GXRFF and PTALF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GXRFF
1D Price
Change %
GXRFF100%
-5.88%
PTALF - GXRFF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
PREKF - GXRFF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
OVV - GXRFF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
TNEYF - GXRFF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
ATHOF - GXRFF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
More

TNEYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TNEYF has been closely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TNEYF jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNEYF
1D Price
Change %
TNEYF100%
-1.25%
BTE - TNEYF
79%
Closely correlated
-0.47%
ZPTAF - TNEYF
77%
Closely correlated
-0.66%
CDDRF - TNEYF
73%
Closely correlated
-3.43%
VET - TNEYF
72%
Closely correlated
-0.66%
MTDR - TNEYF
71%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
More