It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GXYEF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLVS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GXYEF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LVS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
GXYEF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -10.51% price change this week, while LVS (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -6.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -3.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.38%.
LVS is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.
Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
GXYEF | LVS | GXYEF / LVS | |
Capitalization | 30.5B | 39B | 78% |
EBITDA | 1.93B | 3.86B | 50% |
Gain YTD | -23.022 | 10.920 | -211% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 33.24 | - |
Revenue | 15.6B | 10.4B | 150% |
Total Cash | N/A | 5.11B | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 14B | - |
GXYEF | LVS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | 25 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 16 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GXYEF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as LVS (34) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that GXYEF’s stock grew similarly to LVS’s over the last 12 months.
GXYEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LVS (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that GXYEF’s stock grew similarly to LVS’s over the last 12 months.
GXYEF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as LVS (25) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that GXYEF’s stock grew similarly to LVS’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as GXYEF (44) in the null industry. This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to GXYEF’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as GXYEF (90) in the null industry. This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to GXYEF’s over the last 12 months.
GXYEF | LVS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | 2 days ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 2 days ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago66% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago66% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago65% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago62% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXYEF has been loosely correlated with GXYYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GXYEF jumps, then GXYYY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GXYEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GXYEF | 100% | -10.51% | ||
GXYYY - GXYEF | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
SCHYY - GXYEF | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
LVS - GXYEF | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.19% | ||
WYNMY - GXYEF | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.56% | ||
MLCO - GXYEF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.71% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVS has been closely correlated with WYNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LVS jumps, then WYNN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LVS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LVS | 100% | +2.19% | ||
WYNN - LVS | 79% Closely correlated | +2.54% | ||
MLCO - LVS | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
SCHYY - LVS | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
MGM - LVS | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
GXYYY - LVS | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
More |