GXYEF
Price
$4.40
Change
+$0.22 (+5.26%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
30.47B
MCHVF
Price
$1.92
Change
+$0.41 (+27.15%)
Updated
Jul 8 closing price
Capitalization
5.04B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GXYEF vs MCHVF

Header iconGXYEF vs MCHVF Comparison
Open Charts GXYEF vs MCHVFBanner chart's image
Galaxy Entertainment Group
Price$4.40
Change+$0.22 (+5.26%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization30.47B
MGM China Holdings
Price$1.92
Change+$0.41 (+27.15%)
Volume$300
Capitalization5.04B
GXYEF vs MCHVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GXYEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GXYEF vs. MCHVF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GXYEF is a Buy and MCHVF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (GXYEF: $4.40 vs. MCHVF: $1.92)
Brand notoriety: GXYEF and MCHVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GXYEF: 8% vs. MCHVF: 38%
Market capitalization -- GXYEF: $30.47B vs. MCHVF: $5.04B
GXYEF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $30.47B. MCHVF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $5.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GXYEF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GXYEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCHVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GXYEF is a better buy in the long-term than MCHVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GXYEF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHVF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GXYEF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MCHVF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCHVF is a better buy in the short-term than GXYEF.

Price Growth

GXYEF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MCHVF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

GXYEF is expected to report earnings on Apr 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+0.98% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GXYEF($30.5B) has a higher market cap than MCHVF($5.04B). MCHVF YTD gains are higher at: 82.857 vs. GXYEF (4.019). GXYEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.93B vs. MCHVF (-1.06B). GXYEF has higher revenues than MCHVF: GXYEF (15.6B) vs MCHVF (7.92B).
GXYEFMCHVFGXYEF / MCHVF
Capitalization30.5B5.04B605%
EBITDA1.93B-1.06B-183%
Gain YTD4.01982.8575%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue15.6B7.92B197%
Total CashN/A6.95B-
Total DebtN/A30.6B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GXYEF vs MCHVF: Fundamental Ratings
GXYEF
MCHVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4096
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10067
SMR RATING
1..100
12100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4737
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7784
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GXYEF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHVF (73). This means that GXYEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GXYEF (100). This means that MCHVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GXYEF’s over the last 12 months.

GXYEF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCHVF (100). This means that GXYEF’s stock grew significantly faster than MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHVF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as GXYEF (47). This means that MCHVF’s stock grew similarly to GXYEF’s over the last 12 months.

GXYEF's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHVF (84). This means that GXYEF’s stock grew similarly to MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GXYEFMCHVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GXYEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNPAX64.310.41
+0.64%
American Funds New Perspective R1
AFDRX53.62N/A
N/A
American Century Large Cap Equity R
OCMAX22.33N/A
N/A
OCM Gold Atlas
PCBKX11.49N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Balanced R6
VYCFX25.93N/A
N/A
Voya Corporate Leaders 100 R

GXYEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXYEF has been loosely correlated with GXYYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GXYEF jumps, then GXYYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GXYEF
1D Price
Change %
GXYEF100%
N/A
GXYYY - GXYEF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
SCHYY - GXYEF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
LVS - GXYEF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
WYNMY - GXYEF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
MLCO - GXYEF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
More

MCHVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHVF has been loosely correlated with SKYZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHVF jumps, then SKYZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHVF
1D Price
Change %
MCHVF100%
N/A
SKYZF - MCHVF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SCHYF - MCHVF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVY - MCHVF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYYY - MCHVF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
GXYEF - MCHVF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More