GXYYY
Price
$26.31
Change
+$0.22 (+0.84%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
22.94B
KMBIF
Price
$14.33
Change
+$1.31 (+10.06%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
394.3M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GXYYY vs KMBIF

Header iconGXYYY vs KMBIF Comparison
Open Charts GXYYY vs KMBIFBanner chart's image
Galaxy Entertainment Group
Price$26.31
Change+$0.22 (+0.84%)
Volume$9.51K
Capitalization22.94B
Kambi Group
Price$14.33
Change+$1.31 (+10.06%)
Volume$200
Capitalization394.3M
GXYYY vs KMBIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GXYYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KMBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GXYYY vs. KMBIF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GXYYY is a Hold and KMBIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GXYYY: $26.31 vs. KMBIF: $14.33)
Brand notoriety: GXYYY and KMBIF are both not notable
GXYYY represents the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines, while KMBIF is part of the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GXYYY: 32% vs. KMBIF: 45%
Market capitalization -- GXYYY: $22.94B vs. KMBIF: $394.3M
GXYYY [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $22.94B. KMBIF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $394.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $39.62B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $54.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.89B. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GXYYY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKMBIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GXYYY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KMBIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GXYYY is a better buy in the long-term than KMBIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GXYYY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMBIF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GXYYY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KMBIF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KMBIF is a better buy in the short-term than GXYYY.

Price Growth

GXYYY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а +2.06% price change this week, while KMBIF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.54%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +10.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+2.08% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

@Casinos/Gaming (+10.68% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GXYYY($22.9B) has a higher market cap than KMBIF($394M). KMBIF has higher P/E ratio than GXYYY: KMBIF (42.31) vs GXYYY (18.69). KMBIF YTD gains are higher at: 49.582 vs. GXYYY (27.362). GXYYY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.7B vs. KMBIF (52.1M). GXYYY has higher revenues than KMBIF: GXYYY (43.4B) vs KMBIF (169M).
GXYYYKMBIFGXYYY / KMBIF
Capitalization22.9B394M5,812%
EBITDA12.7B52.1M24,376%
Gain YTD27.36249.58255%
P/E Ratio18.6942.3144%
Revenue43.4B169M25,680%
Total CashN/A53.1M-
Total DebtN/A8M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GXYYY vs KMBIF: Fundamental Ratings
GXYYY
KMBIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1946
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5036

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GXYYY's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KMBIF (67). This means that GXYYY’s stock grew somewhat faster than KMBIF’s over the last 12 months.

GXYYY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KMBIF (100). This means that GXYYY’s stock grew similarly to KMBIF’s over the last 12 months.

GXYYY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KMBIF (100). This means that GXYYY’s stock grew similarly to KMBIF’s over the last 12 months.

GXYYY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as KMBIF (44). This means that GXYYY’s stock grew similarly to KMBIF’s over the last 12 months.

GXYYY's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KMBIF (100). This means that GXYYY’s stock grew similarly to KMBIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GXYYYKMBIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
74%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GXYYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KMBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MUECX35.97N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Core Equity C
SWDSX17.68N/A
N/A
Schwab Dividend Equity
DEMRX25.93N/A
N/A
Macquarie Emerging Markets R
LMCKX9.33N/A
N/A
Miller Income FI
SESGX25.03N/A
N/A
Sit ESG Growth S

GXYYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXYYY has been closely correlated with SCHYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GXYYY jumps, then SCHYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GXYYY
1D Price
Change %
GXYYY100%
+0.84%
SCHYY - GXYYY
81%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
WYNMY - GXYYY
71%
Closely correlated
+6.44%
MLCO - GXYYY
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
WYNN - GXYYY
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.87%
LVS - GXYYY
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
More

KMBIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KMBIF and ARHN have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMBIF and ARHN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMBIF
1D Price
Change %
KMBIF100%
N/A
ARHN - KMBIF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRKZF - KMBIF
0%
Poorly correlated
+7.33%
MCHVF - KMBIF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LFDJF - KMBIF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYYY - KMBIF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
More