GYUAF
Price
$23.26
Change
+$5.76 (+32.91%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Capitalization
2.38B
ZMTBY
Price
$2.45
Change
+$0.03 (+1.24%)
Updated
Dec 27 closing price
Capitalization
206.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GYUAF vs ZMTBY

Header iconGYUAF vs ZMTBY Comparison
Open Charts GYUAF vs ZMTBYBanner chart's image
Gs Yuasa
Price$23.26
Change+$5.76 (+32.91%)
Volume$800
Capitalization2.38B
Zumtobel AG
Price$2.45
Change+$0.03 (+1.24%)
Volume$101
Capitalization206.06M
GYUAF vs ZMTBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GYUAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GYUAF vs. ZMTBY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GYUAF is a Hold and ZMTBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (GYUAF: $23.26 vs. ZMTBY: $2.45)
Brand notoriety: GYUAF and ZMTBY are both not notable
GYUAF represents the Auto Parts: OEM, while ZMTBY is part of the Electrical Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GYUAF: 85% vs. ZMTBY: 100%
Market capitalization -- GYUAF: $2.38B vs. ZMTBY: $206.06M
GYUAF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.38B. ZMTBY’s [@Electrical Products] market capitalization is $206.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $88.74B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electrical Products] industry ranges from $254.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.61B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electrical Products] industry is $10.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GYUAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileZMTBY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GYUAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ZMTBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GYUAF is a better buy in the long-term than ZMTBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GYUAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GYUAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

GYUAF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ZMTBY (@Electrical Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.58%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was +2.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.99% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

@Electrical Products (+2.39% weekly)

The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GYUAF($2.38B) has a higher market cap than ZMTBY($206M). ZMTBY has higher P/E ratio than GYUAF: ZMTBY (11.95) vs GYUAF (11.32). GYUAF YTD gains are higher at: 37.960 vs. ZMTBY (0.000). GYUAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 72.6B vs. ZMTBY (96M). GYUAF has more cash in the bank: 54.3B vs. ZMTBY (53.3M). ZMTBY has less debt than GYUAF: ZMTBY (166M) vs GYUAF (114B). GYUAF has higher revenues than ZMTBY: GYUAF (571B) vs ZMTBY (1.12B).
GYUAFZMTBYGYUAF / ZMTBY
Capitalization2.38B206M1,156%
EBITDA72.6B96M75,625%
Gain YTD37.9600.000-
P/E Ratio11.3211.9595%
Revenue571B1.12B51,211%
Total Cash54.3B53.3M101,876%
Total Debt114B166M68,675%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GYUAF vs ZMTBY: Fundamental Ratings
GYUAF
ZMTBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4736
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84100
SMR RATING
1..100
10087
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3974
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1011
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZMTBY's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as GYUAF (29). This means that ZMTBY’s stock grew similarly to GYUAF’s over the last 12 months.

GYUAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as ZMTBY (100). This means that GYUAF’s stock grew similarly to ZMTBY’s over the last 12 months.

ZMTBY's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as GYUAF (100). This means that ZMTBY’s stock grew similarly to GYUAF’s over the last 12 months.

GYUAF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZMTBY (74). This means that GYUAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZMTBY’s over the last 12 months.

GYUAF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as ZMTBY (11). This means that GYUAF’s stock grew similarly to ZMTBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GYUAFZMTBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
12%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GYUAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HQISX21.84N/A
N/A
Hartford Equity Income R4
JGSRX13.36N/A
N/A
JHancock Global Shareholder Yield R2
CIAGX11.79N/A
N/A
AB Concentrated International Growth A
FSEBX14.49N/A
N/A
Fidelity Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund
MBINX31.89-0.17
-0.53%
NYLI Balanced Investor Class

GYUAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GYUAF and EOSE have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GYUAF and EOSE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GYUAF
1D Price
Change %
GYUAF100%
N/A
EOSE - GYUAF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
XPPLF - GYUAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZMTBY - GYUAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VARGF - GYUAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLPKF - GYUAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ZMTBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZMTBY has been loosely correlated with XPON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZMTBY jumps, then XPON could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZMTBY
1D Price
Change %
ZMTBY100%
N/A
XPON - ZMTBY
43%
Loosely correlated
-14.94%
FUWAY - ZMTBY
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
SLDP - ZMTBY
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.69%
EOSE - ZMTBY
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
YASKY - ZMTBY
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
More