GYUAF
Price
$16.86
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
ZMTBY
Price
$2.90
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

GYUAF vs ZMTBY

Header iconGYUAF vs ZMTBY Comparison
Open Charts GYUAF vs ZMTBYBanner chart's image
Gs Yuasa
Price$16.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$800
CapitalizationN/A
Zumtobel AG
Price$2.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$163
CapitalizationN/A
GYUAF vs ZMTBY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GYUAF vs. ZMTBY commentary
Nov 14, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GYUAF is a Hold and ZMTBY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2024
Stock price -- (GYUAF: $16.86 vs. ZMTBY: $2.90)
Brand notoriety: GYUAF and ZMTBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electrical Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GYUAF: 100% vs. ZMTBY: 100%
Market capitalization -- GYUAF: $1.63B vs. ZMTBY: $390.05M
GYUAF [@Electrical Products] is valued at $1.63B. ZMTBY’s [@Electrical Products] market capitalization is $390.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electrical Products] industry ranges from $181.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electrical Products] industry is $4.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GYUAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZMTBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GYUAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZMTBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GYUAF and ZMTBY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

GYUAF (@Electrical Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ZMTBY (@Electrical Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was +0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electrical Products (+0.53% weekly)

The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GYUAF($1.63B) has a higher market cap than ZMTBY($390M). GYUAF has higher P/E ratio than ZMTBY: GYUAF (16.00) vs ZMTBY (5.89). GYUAF YTD gains are higher at: 19.152 vs. ZMTBY (-2.698). GYUAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 27.9B vs. ZMTBY (131M). GYUAF has more cash in the bank: 25.2B vs. ZMTBY (76.2M). ZMTBY has less debt than GYUAF: ZMTBY (207M) vs GYUAF (113B). GYUAF has higher revenues than ZMTBY: GYUAF (494B) vs ZMTBY (1.3B).
GYUAFZMTBYGYUAF / ZMTBY
Capitalization1.63B390M419%
EBITDA27.9B131M21,298%
Gain YTD19.152-2.698-710%
P/E Ratio16.005.89272%
Revenue494B1.3B38,147%
Total Cash25.2B76.2M33,071%
Total Debt113B207M54,589%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GYUAF vs ZMTBY: Fundamental Ratings
GYUAF
ZMTBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4838
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
7679
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4971
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7844
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a53

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZMTBY's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as GYUAF (19). This means that ZMTBY’s stock grew similarly to GYUAF’s over the last 12 months.

ZMTBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GYUAF (100). This means that ZMTBY’s stock grew similarly to GYUAF’s over the last 12 months.

GYUAF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as ZMTBY (79). This means that GYUAF’s stock grew similarly to ZMTBY’s over the last 12 months.

GYUAF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as ZMTBY (71). This means that GYUAF’s stock grew similarly to ZMTBY’s over the last 12 months.

ZMTBY's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GYUAF (78). This means that ZMTBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GYUAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SEKEY8.590.07
+0.82%
Seiko Epson Corp.
CTTAY6.33-0.02
-0.33%
Continental AG
BWEL600.00-5.00
-0.83%
Boswell (J.G.) Co.
NRDBY11.14-0.14
-1.24%
Nordea Bank Abp
NKGFF0.23-0.01
-6.12%
Nevada King Gold Corp.

GYUAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GYUAF and EOSE have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GYUAF and EOSE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GYUAF
1D Price
Change %
GYUAF100%
N/A
EOSE - GYUAF
0%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
XPPLF - GYUAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZMTBY - GYUAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VARGF - GYUAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLPKF - GYUAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ZMTBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZMTBY has been loosely correlated with XPON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZMTBY jumps, then XPON could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZMTBY
1D Price
Change %
ZMTBY100%
N/A
XPON - ZMTBY
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.58%
FUWAY - ZMTBY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLDP - ZMTBY
23%
Poorly correlated
+6.60%
EOSE - ZMTBY
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
MNSEF - ZMTBY
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
More