GZPZY
Price
$39.35
Change
-$0.77 (-1.92%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
5.96B
SCEYF
Price
$10.51
Change
+$0.76 (+7.79%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
138.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GZPZY vs SCEYF

Header iconGZPZY vs SCEYF Comparison
Open Charts GZPZY vs SCEYFBanner chart's image
Gaztransport & Tecnigaz
Price$39.35
Change-$0.77 (-1.92%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.96B
Source Energy Services
Price$10.51
Change+$0.76 (+7.79%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization138.45M
GZPZY vs SCEYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GZPZY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GZPZY vs. SCEYF commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GZPZY is a Buy and SCEYF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (GZPZY: $37.60 vs. SCEYF: $10.51)
Brand notoriety: GZPZY and SCEYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GZPZY: 83% vs. SCEYF: 109%
Market capitalization -- GZPZY: $5.96B vs. SCEYF: $138.45M
GZPZY [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $5.96B. SCEYF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $138.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GZPZY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCEYF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GZPZY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCEYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCEYF is a better buy in the long-term than GZPZY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GZPZY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCEYF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GZPZY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SCEYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCEYF is a better buy in the short-term than GZPZY.

Price Growth

GZPZY (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SCEYF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +15.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.23% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GZPZY($5.96B) has a higher market cap than SCEYF($138M). GZPZY has higher P/E ratio than SCEYF: GZPZY (27.19) vs SCEYF (1.18). GZPZY YTD gains are higher at: 49.506 vs. SCEYF (-6.411). SCEYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 222M vs. GZPZY (183M). GZPZY has more cash in the bank: 253M vs. SCEYF (3.03M). SCEYF has higher revenues than GZPZY: SCEYF (570M) vs GZPZY (341M).
GZPZYSCEYFGZPZY / SCEYF
Capitalization5.96B138M4,320%
EBITDA183M222M82%
Gain YTD49.506-6.411-772%
P/E Ratio27.191.182,306%
Revenue341M570M60%
Total Cash253M3.03M8,358%
Total DebtN/A222M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCEYF: Fundamental Ratings
SCEYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
49
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
32
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GZPZYSCEYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GZPZY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSCLX17.79N/A
N/A
MassMutual Small Cap Opps Adm
VVPSX12.29N/A
N/A
Vulcan Value Partners Small Cap
SSGVX136.12N/A
N/A
State Street Glb All Cap Eq ex-US Idx
SUWZX35.71N/A
N/A
DWS Core Equity R6
JACBX19.15N/A
N/A
JHancock Mid Cap Growth I

GZPZY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GZPZY and CFWFF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GZPZY and CFWFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GZPZY
1D Price
Change %
GZPZY100%
N/A
CFWFF - GZPZY
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.20%
TOLWF - GZPZY
8%
Poorly correlated
-5.29%
THNPY - GZPZY
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
ACDC - GZPZY
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
THNPF - GZPZY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SCEYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCEYF and WFRD have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCEYF and WFRD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCEYF
1D Price
Change %
SCEYF100%
+7.79%
WFRD - SCEYF
7%
Poorly correlated
+6.10%
ACDC - SCEYF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
GZPZY - SCEYF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XPRO - SCEYF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.66%
JUTOY - SCEYF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More