GZPZY vs THNPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GZPZY is a Hold and THNPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GZPZY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTHNPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GZPZY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- THNPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
GZPZY (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +14.50% price change this week, while THNPF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +3.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.32%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+3.86% weekly)The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
| GZPZY | THNPF | GZPZY / THNPF | |
| Capitalization | 5.96B | 4.01B | 149% |
| EBITDA | 183M | 592M | 31% |
| Gain YTD | 36.170 | 28.221 | 128% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.19 | 12.35 | 220% |
| Revenue | 341M | 6.28B | 5% |
| Total Cash | 253M | 3.48B | 7% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 986M | - |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
GZPZY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GZPZY and CFWFF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GZPZY and CFWFF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GZPZY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GZPZY | 100% | N/A | ||
| CFWFF - GZPZY | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TOLWF - GZPZY | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
| THNPY - GZPZY | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.49% | ||
| ACDC - GZPZY | 6% Poorly correlated | +10.69% | ||
| THNPF - GZPZY | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
THNPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that THNPF and THNPY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that THNPF and THNPY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To THNPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THNPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| THNPY - THNPF | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.49% | ||
| ACDC - THNPF | 8% Poorly correlated | +10.69% | ||
| GZPZY - THNPF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CFWFF - THNPF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| XPRO - THNPF | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.10% | ||
More | ||||