HACBY
Price
$19.09
Change
-$0.91 (-4.55%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
4.4B
57 days until earnings call
NBGIF
Price
$14.13
Change
-$0.41 (-2.82%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
12.85B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HACBY vs NBGIF

Header iconHACBY vs NBGIF Comparison
Open Charts HACBY vs NBGIFBanner chart's image
Hachijuni Bank Ltd. (THE)
Price$19.09
Change-$0.91 (-4.55%)
Volume$536
Capitalization4.4B
National Bank of Greece S.A
Price$14.13
Change-$0.41 (-2.82%)
Volume$2.72K
Capitalization12.85B
HACBY vs NBGIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HACBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBGIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HACBY vs. NBGIF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HACBY is a Buy and NBGIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (HACBY: $19.09 vs. NBGIF: $14.13)
Brand notoriety: HACBY and NBGIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HACBY: 34% vs. NBGIF: 72%
Market capitalization -- HACBY: $4.4B vs. NBGIF: $12.85B
HACBY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.4B. NBGIF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $12.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HACBY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNBGIF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HACBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NBGIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NBGIF is a better buy in the long-term than HACBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HACBY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBGIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HACBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NBGIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HACBY is a better buy in the short-term than NBGIF.

Price Growth

HACBY (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NBGIF (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

HACBY is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBGIF($12.9B) has a higher market cap than HACBY($4.4B). HACBY has higher P/E ratio than NBGIF: HACBY (13.95) vs NBGIF (10.05). NBGIF YTD gains are higher at: 78.571 vs. HACBY (59.349). HACBY has higher revenues than NBGIF: HACBY (176B) vs NBGIF (2.77B).
HACBYNBGIFHACBY / NBGIF
Capitalization4.4B12.9B34%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD59.34978.57176%
P/E Ratio13.9510.05139%
Revenue176B2.77B6,351%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A3.7B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HACBY vs NBGIF: Fundamental Ratings
HACBY
NBGIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3382
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54
SMR RATING
1..100
110
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9012
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HACBY's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as NBGIF (47). This means that HACBY’s stock grew similarly to NBGIF’s over the last 12 months.

NBGIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as HACBY (5). This means that NBGIF’s stock grew similarly to HACBY’s over the last 12 months.

HACBY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as NBGIF (10). This means that HACBY’s stock grew similarly to NBGIF’s over the last 12 months.

HACBY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as NBGIF (40). This means that HACBY’s stock grew similarly to NBGIF’s over the last 12 months.

NBGIF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HACBY (90). This means that NBGIF’s stock grew significantly faster than HACBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HACBYNBGIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HACBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBGIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XSVN47.940.07
+0.15%
BondBloxx Bloomberg SevenYrTrgDurUSTrETF
DFSB52.630.06
+0.11%
Dimensional Global Sstby Fxd Inc ETF
EBUF27.79-0.04
-0.14%
Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buf ETF-Qt
GSIE40.66-0.10
-0.25%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Intl Eq ETF
MCH27.36-0.82
-2.92%
Matthews China Active ETF

HACBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HACBY and ADBKF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HACBY and ADBKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HACBY
1D Price
Change %
HACBY100%
N/A
ADBKF - HACBY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBBK - HACBY
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
TMAK - HACBY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NBGIF - HACBY
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.79%
INBC - HACBY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NBGIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBGIF and RRBI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBGIF and RRBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBGIF
1D Price
Change %
NBGIF100%
-2.79%
RRBI - NBGIF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
MCBS - NBGIF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
HACBY - NBGIF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBB - NBGIF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
FBIZ - NBGIF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
More