HACBY
Price
$19.09
Change
-$0.91 (-4.55%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
4.4B
57 days until earnings call
TMAK
Price
$9.50
Change
+$0.15 (+1.60%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
42.52M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HACBY vs TMAK

Header iconHACBY vs TMAK Comparison
Open Charts HACBY vs TMAKBanner chart's image
Hachijuni Bank Ltd. (THE)
Price$19.09
Change-$0.91 (-4.55%)
Volume$536
Capitalization4.4B
Touchmark Bancshares
Price$9.50
Change+$0.15 (+1.60%)
Volume$100
Capitalization42.52M
HACBY vs TMAK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HACBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HACBY vs. TMAK commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HACBY is a Buy and TMAK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (HACBY: $19.09 vs. TMAK: $9.50)
Brand notoriety: HACBY and TMAK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HACBY: 34% vs. TMAK: 2%
Market capitalization -- HACBY: $4.4B vs. TMAK: $42.52M
HACBY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.4B. TMAK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $42.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HACBY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTMAK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HACBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TMAK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HACBY is a better buy in the long-term than TMAK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HACBY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMAK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HACBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TMAK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TMAK is a better buy in the short-term than HACBY.

Price Growth

HACBY (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TMAK (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

HACBY is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HACBY($4.4B) has a higher market cap than TMAK($42.5M). TMAK has higher P/E ratio than HACBY: TMAK (18.08) vs HACBY (13.95). HACBY YTD gains are higher at: 59.349 vs. TMAK (14.458). HACBY has higher revenues than TMAK: HACBY (176B) vs TMAK (13.1M).
HACBYTMAKHACBY / TMAK
Capitalization4.4B42.5M10,360%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD59.34914.458410%
P/E Ratio13.9518.0877%
Revenue176B13.1M1,343,511%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HACBY vs TMAK: Fundamental Ratings
HACBY
TMAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3333
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
555
SMR RATING
1..100
186
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3857
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
904
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HACBY's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as TMAK (70). This means that HACBY’s stock grew similarly to TMAK’s over the last 12 months.

HACBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMAK (55). This means that HACBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMAK’s over the last 12 months.

HACBY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TMAK (86). This means that HACBY’s stock grew significantly faster than TMAK’s over the last 12 months.

HACBY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as TMAK (57). This means that HACBY’s stock grew similarly to TMAK’s over the last 12 months.

TMAK's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HACBY (90). This means that TMAK’s stock grew significantly faster than HACBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HACBYTMAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HACBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WCEAX18.960.04
+0.21%
Macquarie Core Equity Fund Class A
RMFGX61.200.12
+0.20%
American Funds American Mutual R6
MIDKX25.18N/A
N/A
Shelton S&P Midcap Index K
LVOQX17.34N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities R2
FTVCX34.41N/A
N/A
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Val C

HACBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HACBY and ADBKF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HACBY and ADBKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HACBY
1D Price
Change %
HACBY100%
N/A
ADBKF - HACBY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBBK - HACBY
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
TMAK - HACBY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NBGIF - HACBY
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.79%
INBC - HACBY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TMAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TMAK and WTBFA have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMAK and WTBFA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMAK
1D Price
Change %
TMAK100%
N/A
WTBFA - TMAK
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSBQ - TMAK
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
HACBY - TMAK
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JPPHY - TMAK
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TKGBY - TMAK
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
More