HAFC
Price
$26.30
Change
+$0.39 (+1.51%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
776.14M
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBINN
Price
$19.60
Change
+$0.06 (+0.31%)
Updated
Nov 19, 03:23 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAFC vs MBINN

Header iconHAFC vs MBINN Comparison
Open Charts HAFC vs MBINNBanner chart's image
Hanmi Financial
Price$26.30
Change+$0.39 (+1.51%)
Volume$2.02K
Capitalization776.14M
Merchants Ban
Price$19.60
Change+$0.06 (+0.31%)
Volume$499
CapitalizationN/A
HAFC vs MBINN Comparison Chart in %
HAFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBINN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAFC vs. MBINN commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAFC is a Hold and MBINN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (HAFC: $25.91 vs. MBINN: $19.54)
Brand notoriety: HAFC and MBINN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAFC: 65% vs. MBINN: 115%
Market capitalization -- HAFC: $787.52M vs. MBINN: $0
HAFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $787.52M. MBINN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAFC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMBINN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HAFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MBINN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAFC is a better buy in the long-term than MBINN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBINN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MBINN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBINN is a better buy in the short-term than HAFC.

Price Growth

HAFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.72% price change this week, while MBINN (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.96% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAFC YTD gains are higher at: 14.724 vs. MBINN (2.745). HAFC has more cash in the bank: 78.8M vs. MBINN (15.4M). HAFC has less debt than MBINN: HAFC (258M) vs MBINN (3.83B). MBINN has higher revenues than HAFC: MBINN (665M) vs HAFC (246M).
HAFCMBINNHAFC / MBINN
Capitalization776MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.7242.745536%
P/E Ratio10.80N/A-
Revenue246M665M37%
Total Cash78.8M15.4M512%
Total Debt258M3.83B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAFC: Fundamental Ratings
HAFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27
SMR RATING
1..100
29
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HAFCMBINN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBINN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TESRX25.03N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual Shares R
BEQAX37.92N/A
N/A
American Century Equity Growth A
TRIFX4.74N/A
N/A
Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income A
FDKFX16.23N/A
N/A
Fidelity International Discovery K6
TRGVX20.82-0.15
-0.72%
T. Rowe Price Glbl Val Eq

HAFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAFC has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAFC jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAFC
1D Price
Change %
HAFC100%
-0.23%
TRMK - HAFC
78%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
PEBO - HAFC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
BUSE - HAFC
77%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
FFBC - HAFC
76%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
HOPE - HAFC
76%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
More

MBINN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBINN has been loosely correlated with FITBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBINN jumps, then FITBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBINN
1D Price
Change %
MBINN100%
-1.21%
FITBO - MBINN
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
HAFC - MBINN
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
MSBI - MBINN
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
KRNY - MBINN
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
SFST - MBINN
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
More