HAFC
Price
$24.31
Change
+$0.06 (+0.25%)
Updated
Jan 31, 10:58 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
469.44M
88 days until earnings call
SFNC
Price
$22.75
Change
-$0.02 (-0.09%)
Updated
Jan 31, 11:52 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.42B
88 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HAFC vs SFNC

Header iconHAFC vs SFNC Comparison
Open Charts HAFC vs SFNCBanner chart's image
Hanmi Financial
Price$24.31
Change+$0.06 (+0.25%)
Volume$100
Capitalization469.44M
Simmons First National
Price$22.75
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
Volume$300
Capitalization2.42B
HAFC vs SFNC Comparison Chart
Loading...
HAFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAFC vs. SFNC commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAFC is a StrongBuy and SFNC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (HAFC: $24.25 vs. SFNC: $22.77)
Brand notoriety: HAFC and SFNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAFC: 80% vs. SFNC: 75%
Market capitalization -- HAFC: $469.44M vs. SFNC: $2.42B
HAFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $469.44M. SFNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFNC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HAFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAFC is a better buy in the long-term than SFNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAFC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFNC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFNC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFNC is a better buy in the short-term than HAFC.

Price Growth

HAFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.13% price change this week, while SFNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAFC is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

SFNC is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.26% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFNC($2.42B) has a higher market cap than HAFC($469M). SFNC has higher P/E ratio than HAFC: SFNC (13.98) vs HAFC (5.92). HAFC (2.667) and SFNC (2.660) have similar YTD gains . SFNC has more cash in the bank: 345M vs. HAFC (78.8M). HAFC has less debt than SFNC: HAFC (455M) vs SFNC (1.34B). SFNC has higher revenues than HAFC: SFNC (782M) vs HAFC (250M).
HAFCSFNCHAFC / SFNC
Capitalization469M2.42B19%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.6672.660100%
P/E Ratio5.9213.9842%
Revenue250M782M32%
Total Cash78.8M345M23%
Total Debt455M1.34B34%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAFC vs SFNC: Fundamental Ratings
HAFC
SFNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
912
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4392
SMR RATING
1..100
2012
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4149
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAFC's Valuation (46) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFNC (94) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HAFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFNC (92) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HAFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's SMR Rating (12) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (20) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to HAFC’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (49) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (9) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to HAFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HAFCSFNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HAFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MECDX15.470.18
+1.18%
NYLI Epoch Capital Growth Class A
GMXAX16.630.19
+1.16%
Nationwide Mid Cap Market Idx A
AEIUX8.710.06
+0.69%
American Century Equity Income R5
ICHKX12.64N/A
N/A
Guinness Atkinson China & Hong Kong
FGDMX118.20N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesA

HAFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAFC has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAFC jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAFC
1D Price
Change %
HAFC100%
-1.18%
FFBC - HAFC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
GSBC - HAFC
81%
Closely correlated
-1.67%
UVSP - HAFC
81%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
SFNC - HAFC
81%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
UBSI - HAFC
81%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
More

SFNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFNC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFNC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFNC
1D Price
Change %
SFNC100%
+0.80%
UBSI - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
SBCF - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
NWBI - SFNC
89%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
WSFS - SFNC
89%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
UCB - SFNC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
More