It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HAL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePUMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HAL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUMP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
HAL (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -9.45% price change this week, while PUMP (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -4.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.76%.
HAL is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.
PUMP is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.
The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
HAL | PUMP | HAL / PUMP | |
Capitalization | 35.5B | 851M | 4,172% |
EBITDA | 4.94B | 302M | 1,635% |
Gain YTD | -26.639 | 4.296 | -620% |
P/E Ratio | 13.67 | 10.41 | 131% |
Revenue | 23B | 1.63B | 1,411% |
Total Cash | 2.26B | 41.1M | 5,509% |
Total Debt | 8.81B | 149M | 5,912% |
HAL | PUMP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 33 Fair valued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 99 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 36 | 38 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HAL's Valuation (33) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PUMP (73). This means that HAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than PUMP’s over the last 12 months.
HAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PUMP (99). This means that HAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than PUMP’s over the last 12 months.
HAL's SMR Rating (37) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PUMP (93). This means that HAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than PUMP’s over the last 12 months.
PUMP's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as HAL (64). This means that PUMP’s stock grew similarly to HAL’s over the last 12 months.
PUMP's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for HAL (82). This means that PUMP’s stock grew significantly faster than HAL’s over the last 12 months.
HAL | PUMP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago72% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago70% | 5 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 9 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAL has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAL jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PUMP has been closely correlated with LBRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PUMP jumps, then LBRT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PUMP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PUMP | 100% | -2.35% | ||
LBRT - PUMP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
WTTR - PUMP | 73% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
RES - PUMP | 70% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
HAL - PUMP | 67% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
WHD - PUMP | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
More |