Halliburton (HAL) and SLB (SLB), two giants in the oilfield services sector, provide critical technologies for drilling, completion, and production amid fluctuating energy markets. This comparison is particularly relevant for traders and investors navigating recent geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and robust global demand for oil services. Both stocks have shown resilience in recent market activity, with year-to-date gains exceeding 40%, making them attractive for those seeking exposure to energy sector momentum and relative performance differences.
Halliburton Company (HAL) is a leading provider of products and services to the energy industry, focusing on drilling, evaluation, completion, and production solutions, with significant exposure to North American markets. In recent weeks, HAL shares have traded around $40, reflecting a year-to-date gain of approximately 43% and a one-year return of 95%, outpacing broader indices. The company's Q1 2026 results highlighted revenue of $5.4 billion—flat year-over-year but with adjusted EPS of $0.55 beating expectations—and an operating margin expansion to 13%, fueled by international strength offsetting Middle East disruptions. Positive analyst updates, including raised price targets to $47, have supported sentiment amid steady demand for its services.
SLB (SLB), formerly Schlumberger, delivers technology for reservoir characterization, drilling, production, and processing, with a global footprint emphasizing international and offshore operations. Trading near $56 recently, SLB has posted a YTD return of 47% and one-year gain of 66%. Q1 2026 earnings featured revenue of $8.72 billion and EPS of $0.52, surpassing estimates despite operational hits from Middle East conflicts; digital solutions and the ChampionX acquisition drove margin resilience. Analysts remain optimistic, lifting targets to $59, as the company benefits from diversified growth drivers.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. Only 25 bots earn a spot based on AI evaluation of current market conditions, showcasing annualized returns ranging from 15% to 170%, win rates of 48% to 88%, and profit factors up to 6.94. Energy and oil bots, such as those trading multi-ticker portfolios in energy/precious metals or oil/semiconductors, report returns over 78% with drawdowns under $4,000. These automated systems offer swing trading, trend following, and TP/SL (take-profit/stop-loss) corridors for copy trading. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots suited to your strategy.
HAL and SLB operate similar business models in oilfield services but differ in scale and geography: SLB's $84 billion market cap dwarfs HAL's $34 billion, with greater international diversification versus HAL's North America emphasis. Growth drivers include international activity for both, though SLB leverages digital and acquisitions like ChampionX. Recent momentum favors HAL on one-year returns, while SLB edges YTD; comparable P/E ratios (around 23) reflect balanced valuations. Risk factors center on geopolitical tensions and oil prices, with sector exposure heightening volatility. Market sentiment is bullish for both, evidenced by analyst upgrades, but HAL shows tighter margins stability.
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward HAL due to its superior one-year trend consistency, stronger Q1 margin expansion, and relative outperformance amid shared catalysts like international demand. While SLB offers scale advantages and YTD leadership, HAL's positioning suggests higher probability of near-term upside in volatile energy markets.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HAL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HAL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
HAL (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +1.28% price change this week, while SLB (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +1.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +8.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +89.81%.
HAL is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.
SLB is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.
The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
| HAL | SLB | HAL / SLB | |
| Capitalization | 32.7B | 82B | 40% |
| EBITDA | 3.53B | 6.87B | 51% |
| Gain YTD | 39.905 | 44.562 | 90% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.65 | 24.17 | 90% |
| Revenue | 22.2B | 35.9B | 62% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 2.82B | - |
| Total Debt | 8.08B | 11.6B | 70% |
HAL | SLB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SLB's Valuation (27) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as HAL (30). This means that SLB’s stock grew similarly to HAL’s over the last 12 months.
SLB's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as HAL (53). This means that SLB’s stock grew similarly to HAL’s over the last 12 months.
SLB's SMR Rating (59) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as HAL (59). This means that SLB’s stock grew similarly to HAL’s over the last 12 months.
SLB's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as HAL (40). This means that SLB’s stock grew similarly to HAL’s over the last 12 months.
HAL's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as SLB (9). This means that HAL’s stock grew similarly to SLB’s over the last 12 months.
| HAL | SLB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 67% | 9 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 66% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLB has been closely correlated with WFRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLB jumps, then WFRD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLB | 100% | -5.41% | ||
| WFRD - SLB | 77% Closely correlated | -6.32% | ||
| HAL - SLB | 75% Closely correlated | -4.95% | ||
| NOV - SLB | 71% Closely correlated | -6.11% | ||
| BKR - SLB | 66% Loosely correlated | -5.32% | ||
| INVX - SLB | 64% Loosely correlated | -5.44% | ||
More | ||||