HALFF
Price
$122.75
Change
+$0.50 (+0.41%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
11.3B
HRGLF
Price
$14.12
Change
+$1.25 (+9.72%)
Updated
Jan 7 closing price
Capitalization
5.19B
Ad is loading...

HALFF vs HRGLF

Header iconHALFF vs HRGLF Comparison
Open Charts HALFF vs HRGLFBanner chart's image
Hal Trust
Price$122.75
Change+$0.50 (+0.41%)
Volume$130
Capitalization11.3B
Hargreaves Lansdown
Price$14.12
Change+$1.25 (+9.72%)
Volume$222
Capitalization5.19B
HALFF vs HRGLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HALFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HALFF vs. HRGLF commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HALFF is a Hold and HRGLF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (HALFF: $122.75 vs. HRGLF: $14.11)
Brand notoriety: HALFF and HRGLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HALFF: 11% vs. HRGLF: 42%
Market capitalization -- HALFF: $11.3B vs. HRGLF: $5.19B
HALFF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $11.3B. HRGLF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HALFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHRGLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HALFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HRGLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HRGLF is a better buy in the long-term than HALFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HALFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HRGLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HALFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HRGLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HRGLF is a better buy in the short-term than HALFF.

Price Growth

HALFF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HRGLF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.41%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.49% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HALFF($11.3B) has a higher market cap than HRGLF($5.19B). HALFF (15.36) and HRGLF (15.02) have similar P/E ratio . HRGLF YTD gains are higher at: 9.759 vs. HALFF (3.368). HALFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.24B vs. HRGLF (331M). HALFF has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. HRGLF (446M). HRGLF has less debt than HALFF: HRGLF (14.6M) vs HALFF (5.25B). HALFF has higher revenues than HRGLF: HALFF (7.79B) vs HRGLF (642M).
HALFFHRGLFHALFF / HRGLF
Capitalization11.3B5.19B218%
EBITDA5.24B331M1,584%
Gain YTD3.3689.75935%
P/E Ratio15.3615.02102%
Revenue7.79B642M1,213%
Total Cash5.88B446M1,318%
Total Debt5.25B14.6M35,959%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HALFF vs HRGLF: Fundamental Ratings
HALFF
HRGLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9422
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5544
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6112
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HALFF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HRGLF (99). This means that HALFF’s stock grew significantly faster than HRGLF’s over the last 12 months.

HALFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HRGLF (100). This means that HALFF’s stock grew similarly to HRGLF’s over the last 12 months.

HRGLF's SMR Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HALFF (94). This means that HRGLF’s stock grew significantly faster than HALFF’s over the last 12 months.

HRGLF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as HALFF (55). This means that HRGLF’s stock grew similarly to HALFF’s over the last 12 months.

HRGLF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HALFF (61). This means that HRGLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HALFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HALFFHRGLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HALFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MFEJX200.312.21
+1.12%
MFS Growth R4
JHTAX19.530.16
+0.83%
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 3 A
FNCSX33.510.26
+0.78%
Franklin Natural Resources R6
TCMGX21.160.15
+0.71%
Nuveen Mid Cap Growth A
MPRSX9.750.04
+0.41%
MassMutual Strat Emerg Mkts R4

HALFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HALFF and IVSBF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HALFF and IVSBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HALFF
1D Price
Change %
HALFF100%
+0.41%
IVSBF - HALFF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.23%
CG - HALFF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
TROW - HALFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
BUR - HALFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
SEIC - HALFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
More

HRGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HRGLF and WHG have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HRGLF and WHG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRGLF
1D Price
Change %
HRGLF100%
N/A
WHG - HRGLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.84%
HALFF - HRGLF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
HCGI - HRGLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAE - HRGLF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRRPF - HRGLF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
More