Ad is loading...
HAPS vs SCHA
HAPS vs SCHA Comparison
Open Charts HAPS vs SCHA
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Sm CapETF
Price$23.33
Change-$4.01 (-14.67%)
Volume$600
Net Assets106.33M
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$21.35
Change-$0.96 (-4.30%)
Volume$6.41K
Net Assets13.88B
HAPS vs SCHA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HAPS vs. SCHA commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAPS is a Hold and SCHA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 13.9B vs. HAPS (106M). SCHA has a higher annual dividend yield than HAPS: SCHA (-13.532) vs HAPS (-20.263). HAPS was incepted earlier than SCHA: HAPS (2 years) vs SCHA (15 years). SCHA (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than HAPS (0.60). HAPS has a higher turnover SCHA (11.00) vs SCHA (11.00).
| HAPS | SCHA | HAPS / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | -20.263 | -13.532 | 150% |
| Net Assets | 106M | 13.9B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.04 | 1,500% |
| Turnover | 96.00 | 11.00 | 873% |
| Yield | 0.79 | 1.67 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHA | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HAPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAPS has been closely correlated with WAFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAPS jumps, then WAFD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAPS | 100% | N/A | ||
| WAFD - HAPS | 76% Closely correlated | +6.58% | ||
| WD - HAPS | 74% Closely correlated | +6.51% | ||
| PIPR - HAPS | 74% Closely correlated | +14.02% | ||
| WSBC - HAPS | 73% Closely correlated | +5.07% | ||
| HRI - HAPS | 71% Closely correlated | +14.48% | ||
More | ||||
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | +9.26% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | +9.67% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | +14.27% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +10.20% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | +14.93% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | +8.34% | ||
More | ||||