HBCP
Price
$43.45
Change
+$1.21 (+2.86%)
Updated
Apr 15 closing price
Capitalization
302.26M
5 days until earnings call
SMBC
Price
$48.76
Change
+$0.20 (+0.41%)
Updated
Apr 16, 01:18 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
497.01M
12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HBCP vs SMBC

Header iconHBCP vs SMBC Comparison
Open Charts HBCP vs SMBCBanner chart's image
Home Ban
Price$43.45
Change+$1.21 (+2.86%)
Volume$18.93K
Capitalization302.26M
Southern Missouri Ban
Price$48.76
Change+$0.20 (+0.41%)
Volume$130
Capitalization497.01M
HBCP vs SMBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
HBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBCP vs. SMBC commentary
Apr 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBCP is a Buy and SMBC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 16, 2025
Stock price -- (HBCP: $43.45 vs. SMBC: $48.56)
Brand notoriety: HBCP and SMBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBCP: 75% vs. SMBC: 73%
Market capitalization -- HBCP: $302.26M vs. SMBC: $497.01M
HBCP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $302.26M. SMBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $497.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBCP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSMBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HBCP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SMBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HBCP is a better buy in the long-term than SMBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBCP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HBCP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBCP is a better buy in the short-term than SMBC.

Price Growth

HBCP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.50% price change this week, while SMBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

HBCP is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

SMBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.74% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMBC($497M) has a higher market cap than HBCP($302M). SMBC has higher P/E ratio than HBCP: SMBC (11.19) vs HBCP (7.43). HBCP YTD gains are higher at: -5.480 vs. SMBC (-15.033). SMBC has less debt than HBCP: SMBC (136M) vs HBCP (252M). SMBC has higher revenues than HBCP: SMBC (167M) vs HBCP (135M).
HBCPSMBCHBCP / SMBC
Capitalization302M497M61%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.480-15.03336%
P/E Ratio7.4311.1966%
Revenue135M167M81%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt252M136M185%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBCP vs SMBC: Fundamental Ratings
HBCP
SMBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1110
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1941
SMR RATING
1..100
1211
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5360
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1444
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HBCP's Valuation (43) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SMBC (68). This means that HBCP’s stock grew similarly to SMBC’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SMBC (41). This means that HBCP’s stock grew similarly to SMBC’s over the last 12 months.

SMBC's SMR Rating (11) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as HBCP (12). This means that SMBC’s stock grew similarly to HBCP’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SMBC (60). This means that HBCP’s stock grew similarly to SMBC’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SMBC (44). This means that HBCP’s stock grew similarly to SMBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBCPSMBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PDEAX15.92N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Eq Opps A
UMPIX50.11N/A
N/A
ProFunds UltraMid Cap Inv
LADFX19.76N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F
DQEIX11.83N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Global Equity Income - I
PJFOX58.82N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Growth R2

HBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCP has been closely correlated with MOFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBCP jumps, then MOFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBCP
1D Price
Change %
HBCP100%
+2.86%
MOFG - HBCP
79%
Closely correlated
+2.82%
SMBC - HBCP
79%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
EQBK - HBCP
78%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
PPBI - HBCP
78%
Closely correlated
+2.63%
CAC - HBCP
78%
Closely correlated
+2.16%
More