HBCYF
Price
$9.59
Change
-$0.17 (-1.74%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
SCBFY
Price
$25.27
Change
-$0.18 (-0.71%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

HBCYF vs SCBFY

Header iconHBCYF vs SCBFY Comparison
Open Charts HBCYF vs SCBFYBanner chart's image
HSBC Holdings
Price$9.59
Change-$0.17 (-1.74%)
Volume$24.18K
CapitalizationN/A
Standard Chartered
Price$25.27
Change-$0.18 (-0.71%)
Volume$56.9K
CapitalizationN/A
HBCYF vs SCBFY Comparison Chart
Loading...
HBCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBCYF vs. SCBFY commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBCYF is a Buy and SCBFY is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (HBCYF: $9.59 vs. SCBFY: $25.27)
Brand notoriety: HBCYF and SCBFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBCYF: 230% vs. SCBFY: 59%
Market capitalization -- HBCYF: $163.92B vs. SCBFY: $26.81B
HBCYF [@Major Banks] is valued at $163.92B. SCBFY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $26.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBCYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCBFY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HBCYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCBFY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HBCYF is a better buy in the long-term than SCBFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBCYF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCBFY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HBCYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCBFY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBCYF is a better buy in the short-term than SCBFY.

Price Growth

HBCYF (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.75% price change this week, while SCBFY (@Major Banks) price change was -1.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-2.12% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBCYF($164B) has a higher market cap than SCBFY($26.8B). SCBFY has higher P/E ratio than HBCYF: SCBFY (9.88) vs HBCYF (6.92). SCBFY YTD gains are higher at: 54.513 vs. HBCYF (34.554). HBCYF has less debt than SCBFY: HBCYF (85.4B) vs SCBFY (93.9B). HBCYF has higher revenues than SCBFY: HBCYF (71.3B) vs SCBFY (17.1B).
HBCYFSCBFYHBCYF / SCBFY
Capitalization164B26.8B612%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD34.55454.51363%
P/E Ratio6.929.8870%
Revenue71.3B17.1B417%
Total Cash327BN/A-
Total Debt85.4B93.9B91%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBCYF: Fundamental Ratings
HBCYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
23
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26
SMR RATING
1..100
2
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBCYFSCBFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HBCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VVILX28.80N/A
N/A
Vulcan Value Partners Institutional
FDCGX93.14-0.18
-0.19%
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Staples C
TRGZX34.32-0.21
-0.61%
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Z
FTZCX51.65-0.55
-1.05%
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq C
UIVVX11.94-0.37
-3.01%
MFS Intrinsic Value A

HBCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCYF has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBCYF jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBCYF
1D Price
Change %
HBCYF100%
+1.93%
HSBC - HBCYF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
SCBFY - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
SMFNF - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.55%
BCS - HBCYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
BCLYF - HBCYF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
More

SCBFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFY has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFY jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFY
1D Price
Change %
SCBFY100%
-0.71%
HSBC - SCBFY
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
BCS - SCBFY
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
ING - SCBFY
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.57%
SAN - SCBFY
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.93%
SCBFF - SCBFY
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
More