HBEIF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.71M
STLRF
Price
$0.55
Change
+$0.01 (+1.85%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

HBEIF vs STLRF

Header iconHBEIF vs STLRF Comparison
Open Charts HBEIF vs STLRFBanner chart's image
Honey Badger Silver
Price$0.09
Change+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Volume$5.72K
Capitalization3.71M
STLLR GOLD
Price$0.55
Change+$0.01 (+1.85%)
Volume$5.5K
CapitalizationN/A
HBEIF vs STLRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HBEIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBEIF vs. STLRF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBEIF is a Hold and STLRF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (HBEIF: $0.09 vs. STLRF: $0.55)
Brand notoriety: HBEIF and STLRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBEIF: 23% vs. STLRF: 23%
Market capitalization -- HBEIF: $3.71M vs. STLRF: $0
HBEIF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.71M. STLRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBEIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTLRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HBEIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STLRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, STLRF is a better buy in the long-term than HBEIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBEIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STLRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HBEIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STLRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBEIF is a better buy in the short-term than STLRF.

Price Growth

HBEIF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.51% price change this week, while STLRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBEIF YTD gains are higher at: 12.386 vs. STLRF (-4.687).
HBEIFSTLRFHBEIF / STLRF
Capitalization3.71MN/A-
EBITDA-2.34MN/A-
Gain YTD12.386-4.687-264%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBEIF vs STLRF: Fundamental Ratings
HBEIF
STLRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4065
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STLRF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBEIF (86). This means that STLRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBEIF’s over the last 12 months.

STLRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HBEIF (100). This means that STLRF’s stock grew similarly to HBEIF’s over the last 12 months.

STLRF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as HBEIF (100). This means that STLRF’s stock grew similarly to HBEIF’s over the last 12 months.

HBEIF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as STLRF (65). This means that HBEIF’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

HBEIF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as STLRF (100). This means that HBEIF’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBEIFSTLRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HBEIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIMCX29.560.18
+0.61%
Hartford MidCap HLS IA
HDGTX35.420.18
+0.51%
Hartford Dividend and Growth R5
PDRDX11.390.02
+0.18%
Principal Diversified Real Asset Instl
KNGAX11.960.02
+0.17%
Vest S&P500 Div Aristocrats Trgt Inc A
GREYX8.96-0.01
-0.11%
GuideStone Funds Global Rl Est Secs Inst

HBEIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HBEIF and AG have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HBEIF and AG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBEIF
1D Price
Change %
HBEIF100%
+7.75%
AG - HBEIF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.04%
APGOF - HBEIF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.53%
GFIOF - HBEIF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBSW - HBEIF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.94%
STLRF - HBEIF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
More

STLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STLRF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STLRF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STLRF
1D Price
Change %
STLRF100%
+1.50%
PAAS - STLRF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
AGI - STLRF
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
AU - STLRF
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
HL - STLRF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
DOLLF - STLRF
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
More