HBGRF
Price
$1.85
Change
+$0.42 (+29.37%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
683.71M
SSHPF
Price
$0.22
Change
+$0.03 (+15.79%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
64.98M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HBGRF vs SSHPF

Header iconHBGRF vs SSHPF Comparison
Open Charts HBGRF vs SSHPFBanner chart's image
Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
Price$1.85
Change+$0.42 (+29.37%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization683.71M
Vow ASA
Price$0.22
Change+$0.03 (+15.79%)
Volume$200
Capitalization64.98M
HBGRF vs SSHPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SSHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBGRF vs. SSHPF commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBGRF is a Hold and SSHPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (HBGRF: $1.85 vs. SSHPF: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: HBGRF and SSHPF are both not notable
HBGRF represents the Industrial Machinery, while SSHPF is part of the Industrial Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBGRF: 100% vs. SSHPF: 1%
Market capitalization -- HBGRF: $683.71M vs. SSHPF: $64.98M
HBGRF [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $683.71M. SSHPF’s [@Industrial Specialties] market capitalization is $64.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $211.4B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Specialties] industry ranges from $26.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $14.16B. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Specialties] industry is $1.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBGRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSSHPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HBGRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SSHPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SSHPF is a better buy in the long-term than HBGRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SSHPF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SSHPF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

HBGRF (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SSHPF (@Industrial Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.71%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Specialties industry was +0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +75.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+1.50% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

@Industrial Specialties (+0.35% weekly)

Companies in the industrial specialties industry process basic materials and minerals into various specialty products, such as flat and safety glass, fire retardant products, paints and coatings. Examples of companies operating in this industry are Sherwin-Williams Company, PPG Industries, Inc. and RPM International Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBGRF($684M) has a higher market cap than SSHPF($65M). SSHPF has higher P/E ratio than HBGRF: SSHPF (136.59) vs HBGRF (14.29). SSHPF YTD gains are higher at: 42.723 vs. HBGRF (34.058). HBGRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 171M vs. SSHPF (-87.8M). HBGRF has more cash in the bank: 116M vs. SSHPF (34M). HBGRF has less debt than SSHPF: HBGRF (76M) vs SSHPF (541M). HBGRF has higher revenues than SSHPF: HBGRF (2.34B) vs SSHPF (1.01B).
HBGRFSSHPFHBGRF / SSHPF
Capitalization684M65M1,052%
EBITDA171M-87.8M-195%
Gain YTD34.05842.72380%
P/E Ratio14.29136.5910%
Revenue2.34B1.01B233%
Total Cash116M34M341%
Total Debt76M541M14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBGRF vs SSHPF: Fundamental Ratings
HBGRF
SSHPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4244
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59100
SMR RATING
1..100
7998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4337
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9914
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a48

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HBGRF's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as SSHPF (88). This means that HBGRF’s stock grew similarly to SSHPF’s over the last 12 months.

HBGRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SSHPF (100). This means that HBGRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SSHPF’s over the last 12 months.

HBGRF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as SSHPF (98). This means that HBGRF’s stock grew similarly to SSHPF’s over the last 12 months.

SSHPF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as HBGRF (43). This means that SSHPF’s stock grew similarly to HBGRF’s over the last 12 months.

SSHPF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HBGRF (99). This means that SSHPF’s stock grew significantly faster than HBGRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBGRFSSHPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SSHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GOGR0.05N/A
N/A
Go Green Global Technologies Corp.
SGIPF16.29N/A
N/A
SUGI HLDGS CO LTD
JLGRF4.11N/A
N/A
JOHNS LYNG GROUP LTD.
AMEGF0.38-0.01
-1.92%
AMERICAN EAGLE GOLD CORP.
RYLPF27.69-0.56
-1.98%
Koninklijke Philips N.V

HBGRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HBGRF and NLLSY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HBGRF and NLLSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBGRF
1D Price
Change %
HBGRF100%
N/A
NLLSY - HBGRF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSSMY - HBGRF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
DLPX - HBGRF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSHPF - HBGRF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WRTBY - HBGRF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
More

SSHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SSHPF and LASE have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSHPF and LASE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSHPF
1D Price
Change %
SSHPF100%
N/A
LASE - SSHPF
30%
Poorly correlated
+14.75%
HSQVY - SSHPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
MSSMY - SSHPF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
WRTBF - SSHPF
6%
Poorly correlated
+9.66%
YOKEY - SSHPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More