Ad is loading...
HBIOX vs VFWPX
HBIOX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts HBIOX vs VFWPX
Hartford International Opp HLS IB
Price$16.62
Change+$1.03 (+6.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets758.66M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$118.85
Change-$1.32 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.54B
HBIOX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBIOX vs. VFWPX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBIOX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 59.5B vs. HBIOX (759M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than HBIOX: VFWPX (3.04) vs HBIOX (1.19). HBIOX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: HBIOX (27 years) vs VFWPX (14 years). HBIOX (1.01) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). HBIOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). HBIOX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: HBIOX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). HBIOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.66 vs. VFWPX (-6.60). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 32.32 vs. HBIOX (21.85).
| HBIOX | VFWPX | HBIOX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.03 | 3,367% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.03 | 3,367% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.515 | -5.091 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 759M | 59.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 3.04 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.66 | -6.60 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.39 | -2.32 | 707% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.85 | 32.32 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.73 | 15.59 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...