Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBIOX vs VFWPX
HBIOX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts HBIOX vs VFWPX
Hartford International Opp HLS IB
Price$19.48
Change+$0.08 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets806.38M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$145.32
Change+$0.81 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.34B
HBIOX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBIOX vs. VFWPX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBIOX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 71.3B vs. HBIOX (806M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than HBIOX: VFWPX (2.68) vs HBIOX (1.37). HBIOX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: HBIOX (27 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). HBIOX (1.02) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). HBIOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). HBIOX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: HBIOX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). HBIOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.03 vs. VFWPX (15.96). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 40.89 vs. HBIOX (21.16).
| HBIOX | VFWPX | HBIOX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.03 | 3,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.03 | 3,400% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.652 | 21.701 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 806M | 71.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 2.68 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.03 | 15.96 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.06 | 47.91 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.16 | 40.89 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.14 | 69.76 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement