Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs MNMWX
HBLAX vs MNMWX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs MNMWX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.31
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.63B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Trm W
Price$14.41
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.05M
HBLAX vs MNMWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. MNMWX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Buy and MNMWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. MNMWX (299M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than MNMWX: HBLAX (3.41) vs MNMWX (2.93). HBLAX was incepted earlier than MNMWX: HBLAX (19 years) vs MNMWX (6 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than MNMWX (0.77). HBLAX (61.00) and MNMWX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. MNMWX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: MNMWX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). MNMWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.42 vs. HBLAX (1.88). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.91 vs. MNMWX (14.94).
| HBLAX | MNMWX | HBLAX / MNMWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.10 | 890% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.77 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.879 | 2.274 | 83% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 299M | 3,880% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 2.93 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.88 | 4.42 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.68 | 16.29 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.91 | 14.94 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers