Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs MNMWX
HBLAX vs MNMWX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs MNMWX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.84
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.92B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Trm W
Price$14.93
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets300.94M
HBLAX vs MNMWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. MNMWX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Buy and MNMWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. MNMWX (301M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than MNMWX: HBLAX (3.35) vs MNMWX (2.82). HBLAX was incepted earlier than MNMWX: HBLAX (19 years) vs MNMWX (6 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than MNMWX (0.77). HBLAX (61.00) and MNMWX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. MNMWX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: MNMWX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). MNMWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.03 vs. HBLAX (5.10). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.05 vs. MNMWX (12.79).
| HBLAX | MNMWX | HBLAX / MNMWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.10 | 890% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.77 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.474 | 5.828 | 111% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 301M | 3,953% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.35 | 2.82 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.10 | 6.03 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.58 | 20.69 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.05 | 12.79 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers