Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs MNMWX
HBLAX vs MNMWX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs MNMWX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.59
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.76B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Trm W
Price$14.56
Change-$0.03 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets300.61M
HBLAX vs MNMWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. MNMWX commentary
Jun 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a StrongBuy and MNMWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. MNMWX (301M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than MNMWX: HBLAX (3.37) vs MNMWX (2.89). HBLAX was incepted earlier than MNMWX: HBLAX (19 years) vs MNMWX (6 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than MNMWX (0.77). HBLAX (61.00) and MNMWX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. MNMWX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: MNMWX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). MNMWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.76 vs. HBLAX (4.23). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.69 vs. MNMWX (12.99).
| HBLAX | MNMWX | HBLAX / MNMWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.10 | 890% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.77 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.728 | 3.696 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 301M | 3,920% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 2.89 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.23 | 4.76 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.49 | 22.18 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.69 | 12.99 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement