Ad is loading...
HBLAX vs MNMWX
HBLAX vs MNMWX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs MNMWX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$13.84
Change-$0.18 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.55B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Trm W
Price$13.74
Change-$0.16 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.36M
HBLAX vs MNMWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. MNMWX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and MNMWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. MNMWX (293M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than MNMWX: HBLAX (3.37) vs MNMWX (2.95). HBLAX was incepted earlier than MNMWX: HBLAX (19 years) vs MNMWX (6 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than MNMWX (0.77). HBLAX (61.00) and MNMWX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. MNMWX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: MNMWX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). MNMWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.97 vs. HBLAX (2.13). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.45 vs. MNMWX (15.57).
| HBLAX | MNMWX | HBLAX / MNMWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.10 | 890% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.77 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.256 | -1.208 | 21% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 293M | 3,959% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 2.95 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.13 | 2.97 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.47 | 7.37 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.45 | 15.57 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...