Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs NCBIX
HBLAX vs NCBIX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs NCBIX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.99
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.58B
New Covenant Balanced Income
Price$23.79
Change-$0.05 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.12M
HBLAX vs NCBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. NCBIX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and NCBIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. NCBIX (79.1M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than NCBIX: HBLAX (3.29) vs NCBIX (2.40). HBLAX was incepted earlier than NCBIX: HBLAX (19 years) vs NCBIX (26 years). NCBIX (0.95) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. NCBIX (7.00). NCBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: NCBIX (500) vs HBLAX (2000). NCBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.52 vs. HBLAX (2.80). NCBIX (12.62) and HBLAX (12.35) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HBLAX | NCBIX | HBLAX / NCBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.90 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.95 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.289 | 8.784 | 94% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 79.1M | 14,665% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 2.40 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.80 | 5.52 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.34 | 25.53 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.35 | 12.62 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.01 | 35.54 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement