Ad is loading...
HBLAX vs TNVDX
HBLAX vs TNVDX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs TNVDX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$13.93
Change+$0.09 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.39B
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income I
Price$9.95
Change+$0.04 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.67M
HBLAX vs TNVDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. TNVDX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and TNVDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.4B vs. TNVDX (74.7M). TNVDX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: TNVDX (3.96) vs HBLAX (3.37). HBLAX was incepted earlier than TNVDX: HBLAX (19 years) vs TNVDX (9 years). TNVDX (1.38) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). TNVDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. HBLAX (61.00). HBLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TNVDX: HBLAX (2000) vs TNVDX (1000000). HBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.03 vs. TNVDX (-2.59). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.96 vs. TNVDX (11.58).
| HBLAX | TNVDX | HBLAX / TNVDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.82 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.38 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.536 | -2.943 | 52% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.4B | 74.7M | 15,261% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 3.96 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.03 | -2.59 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.22 | 3.97 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.96 | 11.58 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers