Ad is loading...
HBLAX vs TNXAX
HBLAX vs TNXAX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs TNXAX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.21
Change+$0.12 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.55B
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income A
Price$10.17
Change+$0.06 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.87M
HBLAX vs TNXAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. TNXAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Buy and TNXAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. TNXAX (76.9M). TNXAX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: TNXAX (3.72) vs HBLAX (3.37). HBLAX was incepted earlier than TNXAX: HBLAX (19 years) vs TNXAX (9 years). TNXAX (1.62) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). TNXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. HBLAX (61.00). HBLAX (6%) and TNXAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. TNXAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: TNXAX (1000) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.15 vs. TNXAX (-0.14). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.27 vs. TNXAX (10.91).
| HBLAX | TNXAX | HBLAX / TNXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.62 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.242 | -0.871 | -28% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 76.9M | 14,954% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 3.72 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.15 | -0.14 | -2,192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.50 | 6.79 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.27 | 10.91 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers