Ad is loading...
HBLAX vs TNYRX
HBLAX vs TNYRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs TNYRX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.29
Change-$0.22 (-1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.99B
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income R
Price$10.18
Change-$0.10 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.75M
HBLAX vs TNYRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. TNYRX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Buy and TNYRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. TNYRX (78.7M). TNYRX (3.47) and HBLAX (3.37) have matching dividends . HBLAX was incepted earlier than TNYRX: HBLAX (19 years) vs TNYRX (9 years). TNYRX (1.88) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). TNYRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. HBLAX (61.00). TNYRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: TNYRX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.31 vs. TNYRX (0.44). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.39 vs. TNYRX (21.54).
| HBLAX | TNYRX | HBLAX / TNYRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.32 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.88 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.946 | 0.775 | 380% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12B | 78.7M | 15,248% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 3.47 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.31 | 0.44 | 972% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.91 | 4.05 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.39 | 21.54 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers