Ad is loading...
HBLAX vs TNYRX
HBLAX vs TNYRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs TNYRX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.27
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.65B
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income R
Price$10.18
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets77.96M
HBLAX vs TNYRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. TNYRX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Buy and TNYRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. TNYRX (78M). TNYRX (3.46) and HBLAX (3.41) have matching dividends . HBLAX was incepted earlier than TNYRX: HBLAX (19 years) vs TNYRX (9 years). TNYRX (1.88) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). TNYRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. HBLAX (61.00). TNYRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: TNYRX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.79 vs. TNYRX (-0.06). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.10 vs. TNYRX (8.24).
| HBLAX | TNYRX | HBLAX / TNYRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.32 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.88 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.594 | 0.343 | 464% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 78M | 15,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 3.46 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.79 | -0.06 | -4,432% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.05 | 13.63 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.10 | 8.24 | 220% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers