Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs TNYRX
HBLAX vs TNYRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs TNYRX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.65
Change+$0.05 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.77B
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income R
Price$10.48
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.66M
HBLAX vs TNYRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. TNYRX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and TNYRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. TNYRX (84.7M). TNYRX (3.42) and HBLAX (3.35) have matching dividends . HBLAX was incepted earlier than TNYRX: HBLAX (19 years) vs TNYRX (9 years). TNYRX (1.88) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). TNYRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. HBLAX (61.00). TNYRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: TNYRX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.35 vs. TNYRX (0.97). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.88 vs. TNYRX (4.34).
| HBLAX | TNYRX | HBLAX / TNYRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.32 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.88 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.752 | 3.617 | 131% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 84.7M | 13,932% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.35 | 3.42 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.35 | 0.97 | 243% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.97 | 19.83 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.88 | 4.34 | 320% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement