Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs UCMCX
HBLAX vs UCMCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs UCMCX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$15.09
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.9B
Victory Cornerstone Moderately Cnsrv
Price$11.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets187.19M
HBLAX vs UCMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. UCMCX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Buy and UCMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. UCMCX (187M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than UCMCX: HBLAX (3.29) vs UCMCX (1.72). HBLAX was incepted earlier than UCMCX: HBLAX (19 years) vs UCMCX (13 years). UCMCX (1.31) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. UCMCX (48.00). UCMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: UCMCX (500) vs HBLAX (2000). UCMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. HBLAX (3.08). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.79 vs. UCMCX (13.06).
| HBLAX | UCMCX | HBLAX / UCMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.18 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.31 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.157 | 12.204 | 75% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 187M | 6,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 1.72 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.08 | 8.54 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.06 | 23.77 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.79 | 13.06 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.02 | 33.91 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement