Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLFX vs MNMCX
HBLFX vs MNMCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLFX vs MNMCX
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$14.79
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.9B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$14.84
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.54M
HBLFX vs MNMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLFX vs. MNMCX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLFX is a Buy and MNMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. MNMCX (304M). HBLFX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: HBLFX (3.66) vs MNMCX (1.45). HBLFX was incepted earlier than MNMCX: HBLFX (8 years) vs MNMCX (16 years). MNMCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). HBLFX (61.00) and MNMCX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. MNMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: MNMCX (2000) vs HBLFX (1000000). HBLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.89 vs. MNMCX (4.35). HBLFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.24 vs. MNMCX (-0.02).
| HBLFX | MNMCX | HBLFX / MNMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.81 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.81 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.996 | 4.947 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 304M | 3,914% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.66 | 1.45 | 253% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.89 | 4.35 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.28 | 16.01 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.24 | -0.02 | -103,241% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 3.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers