Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLFX vs MNMCX
HBLFX vs MNMCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLFX vs MNMCX
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$15.08
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.6B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$15.09
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets294.13M
HBLFX vs MNMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLFX vs. MNMCX commentary
Nov 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLFX is a StrongBuy and MNMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. MNMCX (294M). HBLFX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: HBLFX (3.59) vs MNMCX (1.42). HBLFX was incepted earlier than MNMCX: HBLFX (9 years) vs MNMCX (16 years). MNMCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). HBLFX (61.00) and MNMCX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. MNMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: MNMCX (2000) vs HBLFX (1000000). HBLFX (3.14) and MNMCX (3.05) have marching annual gain over last year. HBLFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.71 vs. MNMCX (-5.27).
| HBLFX | MNMCX | HBLFX / MNMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.81 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.81 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.346 | 6.290 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 294M | 3,946% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.59 | 1.42 | 254% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.14 | 3.05 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.22 | 19.66 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.71 | -5.27 | -260% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 7.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement