Ad is loading...
HBLFX vs MNMCX
HBLFX vs MNMCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLFX vs MNMCX
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$15.33
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$15.05
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLFX vs MNMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
HBLFX vs. MNMCX commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLFX is a Buy and MNMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 12.8B vs. MNMCX (337M). HBLFX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: HBLFX (3.67) vs MNMCX (1.51). HBLFX was incepted earlier than MNMCX: HBLFX (8 years) vs MNMCX (15 years). HBLFX (57.00) and MNMCX (56.00) have comparable annual turnover. MNMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: MNMCX (2000) vs HBLFX (1000000). HBLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.98 vs. MNMCX (15.97). HBLFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.44 vs. MNMCX (2.85).
| HBLFX | MNMCX | HBLFX / MNMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.161 | 8.339 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.8B | 337M | 3,798% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.67 | 1.51 | 242% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.98 | 15.97 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.52 | -5.99 | -42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.44 | 2.85 | 681% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -6.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers