Ad is loading...
HBLFX vs MNMCX
HBLFX vs MNMCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLFX vs MNMCX
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$14.23
Change+$0.13 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.55B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$14.14
Change+$0.17 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.2M
HBLFX vs MNMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLFX vs. MNMCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLFX is a Buy and MNMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. MNMCX (293M). HBLFX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: HBLFX (3.69) vs MNMCX (1.51). HBLFX was incepted earlier than MNMCX: HBLFX (8 years) vs MNMCX (15 years). MNMCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). HBLFX (61.00) and MNMCX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. MNMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: MNMCX (2000) vs HBLFX (1000000). HBLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.48 vs. MNMCX (2.43). HBLFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.09 vs. MNMCX (0.43).
| HBLFX | MNMCX | HBLFX / MNMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.82 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.82 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.393 | -1.272 | -31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 293M | 3,925% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.69 | 1.51 | 244% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.48 | 2.43 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.46 | 3.93 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.09 | 0.43 | 4,235% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -5.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers