Ad is loading...
HBLFX vs MNMCX
HBLFX vs MNMCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLFX vs MNMCX
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$14.31
Change+$0.08 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$14.20
Change+$0.06 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
HBLFX vs MNMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLFX vs. MNMCX commentary
Dec 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLFX is a Hold and MNMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. MNMCX (322M). HBLFX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: HBLFX (3.67) vs MNMCX (1.51). HBLFX was incepted earlier than MNMCX: HBLFX (8 years) vs MNMCX (15 years). HBLFX (57.00) and MNMCX (56.00) have comparable annual turnover. MNMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: MNMCX (2000) vs HBLFX (1000000). MNMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.11 vs. HBLFX (3.68). HBLFX return over 5 years is better than : 9.73 vs. MNMCX (0.54).
| HBLFX | MNMCX | HBLFX / MNMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.800 | 3.589 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12B | 322M | 3,727% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.67 | 1.51 | 242% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.68 | 4.11 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.04 | -2.14 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.73 | 0.54 | 1,796% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -1.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers