Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLFX vs MNMCX
HBLFX vs MNMCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLFX vs MNMCX
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$15.10
Change+$0.14 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$14.96
Change+$0.14 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.07M
HBLFX vs MNMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLFX vs. MNMCX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLFX is a StrongBuy and MNMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. MNMCX (305M). HBLFX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: HBLFX (3.66) vs MNMCX (1.46). HBLFX was incepted earlier than MNMCX: HBLFX (8 years) vs MNMCX (16 years). MNMCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). HBLFX (61.00) and MNMCX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. MNMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: MNMCX (2000) vs HBLFX (1000000). HBLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.78 vs. MNMCX (2.43). HBLFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.47 vs. MNMCX (-1.81).
| HBLFX | MNMCX | HBLFX / MNMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.81 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.81 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.511 | 5.724 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12B | 305M | 3,934% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.66 | 1.46 | 252% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.78 | 2.43 | 196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.19 | 15.33 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.47 | -1.81 | -1,018% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 10.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers