Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLFX vs NQWFX
HBLFX vs NQWFX Comparison
Open Charts HBLFX vs NQWFX
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$15.13
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.96B
Nuveen Flexible Income R6
Price$19.75
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets848.48M
HBLFX vs NQWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLFX vs. NQWFX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLFX is a Hold and NQWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. NQWFX (848M). NQWFX pays higher dividends than HBLFX: NQWFX (5.18) vs HBLFX (3.58). HBLFX was incepted earlier than NQWFX: HBLFX (9 years) vs NQWFX (9 years). NQWFX (0.73) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). HBLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. NQWFX (40.00). HBLFX (1000000) and NQWFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NQWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.01 vs. HBLFX (2.99). NQWFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.42 vs. HBLFX (18.46).
| HBLFX | NQWFX | HBLFX / NQWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.65 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.73 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.799 | 8.253 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12B | 848M | 1,415% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.58 | 5.18 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.99 | 8.01 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.04 | 25.23 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.46 | 19.42 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement