Ad is loading...
HBLFX vs TNXAX
HBLFX vs TNXAX Comparison
Open Charts HBLFX vs TNXAX
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$14.23
Change+$0.13 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.55B
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income A
Price$10.17
Change+$0.06 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.87M
HBLFX vs TNXAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLFX vs. TNXAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLFX is a Buy and TNXAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. TNXAX (76.9M). TNXAX (3.72) and HBLFX (3.69) have matching dividends . HBLFX was incepted earlier than TNXAX: HBLFX (8 years) vs TNXAX (9 years). TNXAX (1.62) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). TNXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. HBLFX (61.00). TNXAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: TNXAX (1000) vs HBLFX (1000000). HBLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.48 vs. TNXAX (-0.14). HBLFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.09 vs. TNXAX (10.91).
| HBLFX | TNXAX | HBLFX / TNXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.07 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.62 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.393 | -0.871 | -45% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 76.9M | 14,954% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.69 | 3.72 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.48 | -0.14 | -2,423% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.46 | 6.79 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.09 | 10.91 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers