Ad is loading...
HBLFX vs USBLX
HBLFX vs USBLX Comparison
Open Charts HBLFX vs USBLX
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$14.23
Change+$0.13 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.55B
Victory Growth and Tax Strategy
Price$26.51
Change+$0.27 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets790.79M
HBLFX vs USBLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLFX vs. USBLX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLFX is a Buy and USBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. USBLX (791M). HBLFX pays higher dividends than USBLX: HBLFX (3.69) vs USBLX (1.83). HBLFX was incepted earlier than USBLX: HBLFX (8 years) vs USBLX (36 years). HBLFX (0.56) is less costly to investors than USBLX (0.51). HBLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. USBLX (13.00). USBLX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: USBLX (3000) vs HBLFX (1000000). USBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.20 vs. HBLFX (3.48). USBLX return over 5 years is better than : 44.65 vs. HBLFX (18.09).
| HBLFX | USBLX | HBLFX / USBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.51 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.51 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.393 | -5.355 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 3000 | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 791M | 1,454% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.69 | 1.83 | 201% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.48 | 4.20 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.46 | 16.27 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.09 | 44.65 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...