Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLRX vs MNMRX
HBLRX vs MNMRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLRX vs MNMRX
Hartford Balanced Income R3
Price$15.23
Change-$0.06 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.96B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term R
Price$15.04
Change-$0.06 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.5M
HBLRX vs MNMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLRX vs. MNMRX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLRX is a Hold and MNMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. MNMRX (304M). HBLRX pays higher dividends than MNMRX: HBLRX (2.88) vs MNMRX (1.97). HBLRX was incepted earlier than MNMRX: HBLRX (15 years) vs MNMRX (15 years). HBLRX (1.28) and MNMRX (1.28) have similar cost to investors . HBLRX (61.00) and MNMRX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNMRX: HBLRX (0) vs MNMRX (2000). HBLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.37 vs. MNMRX (2.50). HBLRX return over 5 years is better than : 15.18 vs. MNMRX (2.46).
| HBLRX | MNMRX | HBLRX / MNMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.28 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.28 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.435 | 6.742 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12B | 304M | 3,947% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 1.97 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.37 | 2.50 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.32 | 21.05 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.18 | 2.46 | 618% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.97 | 16.61 | 265% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers