Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLRX vs MNMRX
HBLRX vs MNMRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLRX vs MNMRX
Hartford Balanced Income R3
Price$15.17
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.89B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term R
Price$15.08
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.38M
HBLRX vs MNMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLRX vs. MNMRX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLRX is a Hold and MNMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. MNMRX (304M). HBLRX pays higher dividends than MNMRX: HBLRX (2.89) vs MNMRX (1.96). HBLRX was incepted earlier than MNMRX: HBLRX (15 years) vs MNMRX (15 years). HBLRX (1.28) and MNMRX (1.28) have similar cost to investors . HBLRX (61.00) and MNMRX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNMRX: HBLRX (0) vs MNMRX (2000). MNMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.53 vs. HBLRX (2.92). HBLRX return over 5 years is better than : 14.64 vs. MNMRX (1.76).
| HBLRX | MNMRX | HBLRX / MNMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.28 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.28 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.712 | 7.239 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 304M | 3,914% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 1.96 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.92 | 3.53 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.58 | 27.57 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.64 | 1.76 | 833% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.17 | 16.03 | 263% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers