Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLRX vs MNMRX
HBLRX vs MNMRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLRX vs MNMRX
Hartford Balanced Income R3
Price$14.85
Change+$0.08 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.77B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term R
Price$14.81
Change+$0.10 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets297.59M
HBLRX vs MNMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLRX vs. MNMRX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLRX is a Hold and MNMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. MNMRX (298M). HBLRX pays higher dividends than MNMRX: HBLRX (2.94) vs MNMRX (2.00). HBLRX was incepted earlier than MNMRX: HBLRX (15 years) vs MNMRX (15 years). HBLRX (1.28) and MNMRX (1.28) have similar cost to investors . HBLRX (61.00) and MNMRX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNMRX: HBLRX (0) vs MNMRX (2000). HBLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.69 vs. MNMRX (2.31). HBLRX return over 5 years is better than : 11.26 vs. MNMRX (0.03).
| HBLRX | MNMRX | HBLRX / MNMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.28 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.28 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.160 | 4.400 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 298M | 3,960% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.94 | 2.00 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.69 | 2.31 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.66 | 13.45 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.26 | 0.03 | 35,459% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.76 | 10.94 | 327% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers