Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLRX vs RMYCX
HBLRX vs RMYCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLRX vs RMYCX
Hartford Balanced Income R3
Price$15.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.95B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income C
Price$9.80
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.47M
HBLRX vs RMYCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLRX vs. RMYCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLRX is a StrongBuy and RMYCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. RMYCX (292M). RMYCX pays higher dividends than HBLRX: RMYCX (4.66) vs HBLRX (2.88). HBLRX was incepted earlier than RMYCX: HBLRX (15 years) vs RMYCX (10 years). RMYCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than HBLRX (1.28). RMYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. HBLRX (61.00). HBLRX (0) and RMYCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.22 vs. HBLRX (3.17). RMYCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.87 vs. HBLRX (14.35).
| HBLRX | RMYCX | HBLRX / RMYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.75 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.92 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.866 | 9.397 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12B | 292M | 4,110% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 4.66 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.17 | 6.22 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.36 | 25.11 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.35 | 15.87 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.10 | 31.37 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers