Ad is loading...
HBLRX vs RMYCX
HBLRX vs RMYCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLRX vs RMYCX
Hartford Balanced Income R3
Price$14.39
Change+$0.07 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.64B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income C
Price$9.38
Change+$0.04 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets282.88M
HBLRX vs RMYCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLRX vs. RMYCX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLRX is a Buy and RMYCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. RMYCX (283M). RMYCX pays higher dividends than HBLRX: RMYCX (4.66) vs HBLRX (2.99). HBLRX was incepted earlier than RMYCX: HBLRX (15 years) vs RMYCX (10 years). RMYCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than HBLRX (1.28). RMYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. HBLRX (61.00). HBLRX (0) and RMYCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.08 vs. HBLRX (3.44). RMYCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.44 vs. HBLRX (16.29).
| HBLRX | RMYCX | HBLRX / RMYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.75 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.92 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.198 | 3.225 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 283M | 4,099% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.99 | 4.66 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.44 | 8.08 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.99 | 9.68 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.29 | 18.44 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.33 | 17.49 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers