Ad is loading...
HBLRX vs RMYCX
HBLRX vs RMYCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLRX vs RMYCX
Hartford Balanced Income R3
Price$14.62
Change+$0.06 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.14B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income C
Price$9.32
Change+$0.06 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets294.63M
HBLRX vs RMYCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLRX vs. RMYCX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLRX is a Buy and RMYCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. RMYCX (295M). RMYCX pays higher dividends than HBLRX: RMYCX (4.04) vs HBLRX (2.97). HBLRX was incepted earlier than RMYCX: HBLRX (15 years) vs RMYCX (10 years). RMYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. HBLRX (57.00). HBLRX (0) and RMYCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.38 vs. HBLRX (5.58). HBLRX return over 5 years is better than : 7.99 vs. RMYCX (6.49).
| HBLRX | RMYCX | HBLRX / RMYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.104 | 2.193 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 295M | 4,102% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 4.04 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.58 | 7.38 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.29 | 0.57 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.99 | 6.49 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...