Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLRX vs RMYCX
HBLRX vs RMYCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLRX vs RMYCX
Hartford Balanced Income R3
Price$15.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.91B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income C
Price$9.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets289.88M
HBLRX vs RMYCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLRX vs. RMYCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLRX is a StrongBuy and RMYCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. RMYCX (290M). RMYCX pays higher dividends than HBLRX: RMYCX (4.78) vs HBLRX (2.94). HBLRX was incepted earlier than RMYCX: HBLRX (15 years) vs RMYCX (10 years). RMYCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than HBLRX (1.28). RMYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. HBLRX (61.00). HBLRX (0) and RMYCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.68 vs. HBLRX (3.79). RMYCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.34 vs. HBLRX (13.07).
| HBLRX | RMYCX | HBLRX / RMYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.75 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.92 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.869 | 7.954 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 290M | 4,103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.94 | 4.78 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.79 | 6.68 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.90 | 16.34 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.07 | 14.34 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.76 | 26.15 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers