Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs IBBFX
HBLSX vs IBBFX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs IBBFX
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.87
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.9B
Thrivent Dynamic Allocation S
Price$14.31
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets423.97M
HBLSX vs IBBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. IBBFX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Buy and IBBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. IBBFX (424M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than IBBFX: HBLSX (3.24) vs IBBFX (3.01). HBLSX was incepted earlier than IBBFX: HBLSX (15 years) vs IBBFX (28 years). HBLSX (0.96) is less costly to investors than IBBFX (0.77). IBBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. HBLSX (61.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBBFX: HBLSX (0) vs IBBFX (2000). IBBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.14 vs. HBLSX (5.78). IBBFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.38 vs. HBLSX (16.78).
| HBLSX | IBBFX | HBLSX / IBBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.75 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.77 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.525 | 5.842 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 424M | 2,807% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.24 | 3.01 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.78 | 7.14 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.75 | 26.26 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.78 | 32.38 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.05 | 40.33 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement