Ad is loading...
HBLSX vs MNMCX
HBLSX vs MNMCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs MNMCX
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.38
Change-$0.22 (-1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.99B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$14.09
Change-$0.18 (-1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.17M
HBLSX vs MNMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. MNMCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Hold and MNMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. MNMCX (303M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: HBLSX (3.26) vs MNMCX (1.51). HBLSX was incepted earlier than MNMCX: HBLSX (15 years) vs MNMCX (15 years). MNMCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX (61.00) and MNMCX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNMCX: HBLSX (0) vs MNMCX (2000). HBLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.55 vs. MNMCX (3.06). HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 28.44 vs. MNMCX (9.27).
| HBLSX | MNMCX | HBLSX / MNMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.82 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.82 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.251 | 0.848 | 383% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12B | 303M | 3,960% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 1.51 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.55 | 3.06 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.10 | 2.57 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.44 | 9.27 | 307% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.03 | -2.16 | -1,573% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers