Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs MNMCX
HBLSX vs MNMCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs MNMCX
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.60
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.74B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$14.55
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.06M
HBLSX vs MNMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. MNMCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a StrongBuy and MNMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. MNMCX (301M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: HBLSX (3.26) vs MNMCX (1.48). HBLSX was incepted earlier than MNMCX: HBLSX (15 years) vs MNMCX (15 years). MNMCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX (61.00) and MNMCX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNMCX: HBLSX (0) vs MNMCX (2000). MNMCX (3.61) and HBLSX (3.54) have marching annual gain over last year. HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 11.86 vs. MNMCX (-1.49).
| HBLSX | MNMCX | HBLSX / MNMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.81 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.81 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.392 | 2.968 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 301M | 3,887% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 1.48 | 220% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.54 | 3.61 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.08 | 10.86 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.86 | -1.49 | -795% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.91 | 0.94 | 3,804% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers