Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs MNMCX
HBLSX vs MNMCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs MNMCX
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.87
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.9B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$14.85
Change+$0.07 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.54M
HBLSX vs MNMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. MNMCX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Buy and MNMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. MNMCX (304M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: HBLSX (3.24) vs MNMCX (1.45). HBLSX was incepted earlier than MNMCX: HBLSX (15 years) vs MNMCX (16 years). MNMCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX (61.00) and MNMCX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNMCX: HBLSX (0) vs MNMCX (2000). HBLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.48 vs. MNMCX (4.35). HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 17.02 vs. MNMCX (-0.02).
| HBLSX | MNMCX | HBLSX / MNMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.81 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.81 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.739 | 4.947 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 304M | 3,914% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.24 | 1.45 | 224% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.48 | 4.35 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.91 | 16.01 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.02 | -0.02 | -91,306% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.81 | 3.02 | 1,320% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers