Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs MNMCX
HBLSX vs MNMCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs MNMCX
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$15.16
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.6B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$15.09
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets294.13M
HBLSX vs MNMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. MNMCX commentary
Nov 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a StrongBuy and MNMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. MNMCX (294M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: HBLSX (3.19) vs MNMCX (1.42). HBLSX was incepted earlier than MNMCX: HBLSX (16 years) vs MNMCX (16 years). MNMCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX (61.00) and MNMCX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNMCX: HBLSX (0) vs MNMCX (2000). MNMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.05 vs. HBLSX (2.56). HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 11.40 vs. MNMCX (-5.27).
| HBLSX | MNMCX | HBLSX / MNMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.81 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.81 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.741 | 6.290 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 294M | 3,946% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 1.42 | 225% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.56 | 3.05 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.64 | 19.66 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.40 | -5.27 | -216% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.01 | 7.53 | 571% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement