Ad is loading...
HBLSX vs MNMCX
HBLSX vs MNMCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs MNMCX
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.30
Change+$0.12 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.55B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$14.14
Change+$0.17 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.2M
HBLSX vs MNMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. MNMCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Buy and MNMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. MNMCX (293M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: HBLSX (3.26) vs MNMCX (1.51). HBLSX was incepted earlier than MNMCX: HBLSX (15 years) vs MNMCX (15 years). MNMCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX (61.00) and MNMCX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNMCX: HBLSX (0) vs MNMCX (2000). HBLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.11 vs. MNMCX (2.43). HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 15.97 vs. MNMCX (0.43).
| HBLSX | MNMCX | HBLSX / MNMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.82 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.82 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.281 | -1.272 | -22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 293M | 3,925% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 1.51 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.11 | 2.43 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.27 | 3.93 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.97 | 0.43 | 3,739% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.95 | -5.03 | -576% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers