Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs MNMRX
HBLSX vs MNMRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs MNMRX
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$15.01
Change-$0.04 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.56B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term R
Price$14.94
Change-$0.08 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets294.34M
HBLSX vs MNMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. MNMRX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Hold and MNMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. MNMRX (294M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than MNMRX: HBLSX (3.19) vs MNMRX (1.94). HBLSX was incepted earlier than MNMRX: HBLSX (15 years) vs MNMRX (15 years). MNMRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX (61.00) and MNMRX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNMRX: HBLSX (0) vs MNMRX (2000). MNMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.97 vs. HBLSX (2.69). HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 11.95 vs. MNMRX (-1.03).
| HBLSX | MNMRX | HBLSX / MNMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.28 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.28 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.166 | 6.600 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 294M | 3,946% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 1.94 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.69 | 3.97 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.86 | 22.75 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.95 | -1.03 | -1,163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.46 | 14.57 | 291% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers