Ad is loading...
HBLSX vs MNMRX
HBLSX vs MNMRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs MNMRX
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.30
Change+$0.12 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.55B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term R
Price$14.10
Change+$0.16 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.2M
HBLSX vs MNMRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. MNMRX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Buy and MNMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. MNMRX (293M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than MNMRX: HBLSX (3.26) vs MNMRX (2.07). HBLSX was incepted earlier than MNMRX: HBLSX (15 years) vs MNMRX (15 years). MNMRX (1.30) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX (61.00) and MNMRX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNMRX: HBLSX (0) vs MNMRX (2000). HBLSX (3.11) and MNMRX (2.99) have marching annual gain over last year. HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 15.97 vs. MNMRX (3.90).
| HBLSX | MNMRX | HBLSX / MNMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.30 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.30 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.281 | -1.065 | -26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 293M | 3,925% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 2.07 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.11 | 2.99 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.27 | 5.68 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.97 | 3.90 | 410% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.95 | 1.40 | 2,064% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers