Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs MNMRX
HBLSX vs MNMRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs MNMRX
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$15.18
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.89B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term R
Price$15.08
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.38M
HBLSX vs MNMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. MNMRX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Hold and MNMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. MNMRX (304M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than MNMRX: HBLSX (3.18) vs MNMRX (1.96). HBLSX was incepted earlier than MNMRX: HBLSX (15 years) vs MNMRX (15 years). MNMRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX (61.00) and MNMRX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNMRX: HBLSX (0) vs MNMRX (2000). MNMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.53 vs. HBLSX (3.31). HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 16.30 vs. MNMRX (1.76).
| HBLSX | MNMRX | HBLSX / MNMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.28 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.28 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.028 | 7.239 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 304M | 3,914% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 1.96 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.31 | 3.53 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.78 | 27.57 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.30 | 1.76 | 928% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.99 | 16.03 | 287% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers