Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs MNMRX
HBLSX vs MNMRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs MNMRX
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.86
Change+$0.08 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.77B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term R
Price$14.81
Change+$0.10 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets297.59M
HBLSX vs MNMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. MNMRX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Hold and MNMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. MNMRX (298M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than MNMRX: HBLSX (3.24) vs MNMRX (2.00). HBLSX was incepted earlier than MNMRX: HBLSX (15 years) vs MNMRX (15 years). MNMRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX (61.00) and MNMRX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNMRX: HBLSX (0) vs MNMRX (2000). HBLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.00 vs. MNMRX (2.31). HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 12.89 vs. MNMRX (0.03).
| HBLSX | MNMRX | HBLSX / MNMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.28 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.28 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.383 | 4.400 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 298M | 3,960% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.24 | 2.00 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.00 | 2.31 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.65 | 13.45 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.89 | 0.03 | 40,605% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.34 | 10.94 | 360% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers