Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs MNMRX
HBLSX vs MNMRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs MNMRX
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.69
Change-$0.08 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.79B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term R
Price$14.53
Change-$0.13 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets300.95M
HBLSX vs MNMRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. MNMRX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a StrongBuy and MNMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. MNMRX (301M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than MNMRX: HBLSX (3.26) vs MNMRX (2.03). HBLSX was incepted earlier than MNMRX: HBLSX (15 years) vs MNMRX (15 years). MNMRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX (61.00) and MNMRX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNMRX: HBLSX (0) vs MNMRX (2000). MNMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.74 vs. HBLSX (4.40). HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 15.74 vs. MNMRX (4.30).
| HBLSX | MNMRX | HBLSX / MNMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.28 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.28 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.887 | 4.045 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 301M | 3,920% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 2.03 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.40 | 4.74 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.57 | 19.77 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.74 | 4.30 | 366% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.15 | 8.42 | 429% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement