Ad is loading...
HBLSX vs RMYCX
HBLSX vs RMYCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs RMYCX
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.30
Change+$0.12 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.55B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income C
Price$9.27
Change+$0.06 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets278.44M
HBLSX vs RMYCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. RMYCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Buy and RMYCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. RMYCX (278M). RMYCX pays higher dividends than HBLSX: RMYCX (4.33) vs HBLSX (3.26). HBLSX was incepted earlier than RMYCX: HBLSX (15 years) vs RMYCX (10 years). RMYCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). RMYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. HBLSX (61.00). HBLSX (0) and RMYCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.59 vs. HBLSX (3.11). RMYCX return over 5 years is better than : 17.86 vs. HBLSX (15.97).
| HBLSX | RMYCX | HBLSX / RMYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.75 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.92 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.281 | 1.354 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 278M | 4,137% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 4.33 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.11 | 6.59 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.27 | 5.59 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.97 | 17.86 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.95 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers