Ad is loading...
HBLSX vs RMYCX
HBLSX vs RMYCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs RMYCX
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.46
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.1B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income C
Price$9.18
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.82M
HBLSX vs RMYCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. RMYCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Buy and RMYCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. RMYCX (294M). RMYCX pays higher dividends than HBLSX: RMYCX (4.04) vs HBLSX (3.25). HBLSX was incepted earlier than RMYCX: HBLSX (15 years) vs RMYCX (10 years). RMYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. HBLSX (57.00). HBLSX (0) and RMYCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.82 vs. HBLSX (5.93). HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 7.95 vs. RMYCX (3.12).
| HBLSX | RMYCX | HBLSX / RMYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.403 | 0.658 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 294M | 4,116% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.25 | 4.04 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.93 | 6.82 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.23 | -1.33 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.95 | 3.12 | 255% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers