Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs TNVDX
HBLSX vs TNVDX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs TNVDX
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$15.19
Change+$0.04 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.9B
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income I
Price$10.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.96M
HBLSX vs TNVDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. TNVDX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Buy and TNVDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. TNVDX (91M). TNVDX pays higher dividends than HBLSX: TNVDX (3.83) vs HBLSX (3.18). HBLSX was incepted earlier than TNVDX: HBLSX (15 years) vs TNVDX (10 years). TNVDX (1.38) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). TNVDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. HBLSX (61.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than TNVDX: HBLSX (0) vs TNVDX (1000000). HBLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.04 vs. TNVDX (1.71). HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 18.50 vs. TNVDX (9.33).
| HBLSX | TNVDX | HBLSX / TNVDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.82 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.38 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.172 | 8.148 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 91M | 13,077% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 3.83 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.04 | 1.71 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.86 | 24.25 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.50 | 9.33 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.41 | N/A | - |