Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLTX vs MNMCX
HBLTX vs MNMCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLTX vs MNMCX
Hartford Balanced Income R5
Price$14.62
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.74B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$14.55
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.06M
HBLTX vs MNMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLTX vs. MNMCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLTX is a StrongBuy and MNMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLTX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. MNMCX (301M). HBLTX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: HBLTX (3.56) vs MNMCX (1.48). HBLTX was incepted earlier than MNMCX: HBLTX (15 years) vs MNMCX (15 years). MNMCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than HBLTX (0.66). HBLTX (61.00) and MNMCX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNMCX: HBLTX (0) vs MNMCX (2000). HBLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.86 vs. MNMCX (3.61). HBLTX return over 5 years is better than : 13.48 vs. MNMCX (-1.49).
| HBLTX | MNMCX | HBLTX / MNMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.81 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.81 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.544 | 2.968 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 301M | 3,887% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.56 | 1.48 | 240% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.86 | 3.61 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.15 | 10.86 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.48 | -1.49 | -904% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.42 | 0.94 | 4,176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement