Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLTX vs NQWFX
HBLTX vs NQWFX Comparison
Open Charts HBLTX vs NQWFX
Hartford Balanced Income R5
Price$15.15
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.89B
Nuveen Flexible Income R6
Price$19.74
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets851.55M
HBLTX vs NQWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLTX vs. NQWFX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLTX is a Buy and NQWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLTX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. NQWFX (852M). NQWFX pays higher dividends than HBLTX: NQWFX (5.11) vs HBLTX (3.47). HBLTX was incepted earlier than NQWFX: HBLTX (15 years) vs NQWFX (9 years). NQWFX (0.73) is less costly to investors than HBLTX (0.66). HBLTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. NQWFX (40.00). HBLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQWFX: HBLTX (0) vs NQWFX (1000000). NQWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.58 vs. HBLTX (3.55). NQWFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.35 vs. HBLTX (18.00).
| HBLTX | NQWFX | HBLTX / NQWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.65 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.73 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.335 | 9.054 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 852M | 1,397% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.47 | 5.11 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.55 | 8.58 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.53 | 30.72 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.00 | 19.35 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.67 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers