Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLVX vs MNMCX
HBLVX vs MNMCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLVX vs MNMCX
Hartford Balanced Income R6
Price$14.74
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.74B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$14.55
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.06M
HBLVX vs MNMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLVX vs. MNMCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLVX is a StrongBuy and MNMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLVX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. MNMCX (301M). HBLVX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: HBLVX (3.63) vs MNMCX (1.48). HBLVX was incepted earlier than MNMCX: HBLVX (11 years) vs MNMCX (15 years). MNMCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than HBLVX (0.56). HBLVX (61.00) and MNMCX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNMCX: HBLVX (0) vs MNMCX (2000). HBLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.00 vs. MNMCX (3.61). HBLVX return over 5 years is better than : 14.08 vs. MNMCX (-1.49).
| HBLVX | MNMCX | HBLVX / MNMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.81 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.81 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.544 | 2.968 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 301M | 3,887% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.63 | 1.48 | 245% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.00 | 3.61 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.50 | 10.86 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.08 | -1.49 | -944% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.76 | 0.94 | 4,318% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers