Ad is loading...
HBLVX vs MNMCX
HBLVX vs MNMCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLVX vs MNMCX
Hartford Balanced Income R6
Price$14.43
Change+$0.12 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.55B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$14.14
Change+$0.17 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.2M
HBLVX vs MNMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLVX vs. MNMCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLVX is a Buy and MNMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLVX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. MNMCX (293M). HBLVX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: HBLVX (3.63) vs MNMCX (1.51). HBLVX was incepted earlier than MNMCX: HBLVX (10 years) vs MNMCX (15 years). MNMCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than HBLVX (0.56). HBLVX (61.00) and MNMCX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNMCX: HBLVX (0) vs MNMCX (2000). HBLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.57 vs. MNMCX (2.43). HBLVX return over 5 years is better than : 18.24 vs. MNMCX (0.43).
| HBLVX | MNMCX | HBLVX / MNMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.82 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.82 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.387 | -1.272 | -30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 293M | 3,925% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.63 | 1.51 | 241% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.57 | 2.43 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.60 | 3.93 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.24 | 0.43 | 4,271% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.43 | -5.03 | -665% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers