Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLVX vs NQWFX
HBLVX vs NQWFX Comparison
Open Charts HBLVX vs NQWFX
Hartford Balanced Income R6
Price$15.26
Change-$0.06 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.89B
Nuveen Flexible Income R6
Price$19.74
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets851.55M
HBLVX vs NQWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLVX vs. NQWFX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLVX is a Buy and NQWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLVX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. NQWFX (852M). NQWFX pays higher dividends than HBLVX: NQWFX (5.11) vs HBLVX (3.54). HBLVX was incepted earlier than NQWFX: HBLVX (11 years) vs NQWFX (9 years). NQWFX (0.73) is less costly to investors than HBLVX (0.56). HBLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. NQWFX (40.00). HBLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQWFX: HBLVX (0) vs NQWFX (1000000). NQWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.58 vs. HBLVX (3.70). NQWFX (19.35) and HBLVX (18.69) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HBLVX | NQWFX | HBLVX / NQWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.65 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.73 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.420 | 9.054 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 852M | 1,397% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.54 | 5.11 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.70 | 8.58 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.05 | 30.72 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.69 | 19.35 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement