Ad is loading...
HBLVX vs RMYCX
HBLVX vs RMYCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLVX vs RMYCX
Hartford Balanced Income R6
Price$14.43
Change+$0.12 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.55B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income C
Price$9.27
Change+$0.06 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets278.44M
HBLVX vs RMYCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLVX vs. RMYCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLVX is a Buy and RMYCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLVX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. RMYCX (278M). RMYCX pays higher dividends than HBLVX: RMYCX (4.33) vs HBLVX (3.63). HBLVX was incepted earlier than RMYCX: HBLVX (10 years) vs RMYCX (10 years). RMYCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than HBLVX (0.56). RMYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. HBLVX (61.00). HBLVX (0) and RMYCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.59 vs. HBLVX (3.57). HBLVX (18.24) and RMYCX (17.86) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HBLVX | RMYCX | HBLVX / RMYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.75 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.92 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.387 | 1.354 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 278M | 4,137% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.63 | 4.33 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.57 | 6.59 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.60 | 5.59 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.24 | 17.86 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers