Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLYX vs MNMRX
HBLYX vs MNMRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLYX vs MNMRX
Hartford Balanced Income Y
Price$15.32
Change+$0.14 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term R
Price$14.94
Change+$0.13 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.07M
HBLYX vs MNMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLYX vs. MNMRX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLYX is a StrongBuy and MNMRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLYX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. MNMRX (305M). HBLYX pays higher dividends than MNMRX: HBLYX (3.51) vs MNMRX (2.00). HBLYX was incepted earlier than MNMRX: HBLYX (19 years) vs MNMRX (15 years). MNMRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than HBLYX (0.67). HBLYX (61.00) and MNMRX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. MNMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLYX: MNMRX (2000) vs HBLYX (250000). HBLYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.66 vs. MNMRX (2.92). HBLYX return over 5 years is better than : 18.05 vs. MNMRX (1.60).
| HBLYX | MNMRX | HBLYX / MNMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.28 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.28 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.401 | 6.033 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2000 | 12,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12B | 305M | 3,934% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 2.00 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.66 | 2.92 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.86 | 17.01 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.05 | 1.60 | 1,131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.84 | 17.65 | 311% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement