Ad is loading...
HBLYX vs MNMRX
HBLYX vs MNMRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLYX vs MNMRX
Hartford Balanced Income Y
Price$14.44
Change+$0.13 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.55B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term R
Price$14.10
Change+$0.16 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.2M
HBLYX vs MNMRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLYX vs. MNMRX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLYX is a Buy and MNMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLYX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. MNMRX (293M). HBLYX pays higher dividends than MNMRX: HBLYX (3.53) vs MNMRX (2.07). HBLYX was incepted earlier than MNMRX: HBLYX (19 years) vs MNMRX (15 years). MNMRX (1.30) is less costly to investors than HBLYX (0.67). HBLYX (61.00) and MNMRX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. MNMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLYX: MNMRX (2000) vs HBLYX (250000). HBLYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.39 vs. MNMRX (2.99). HBLYX return over 5 years is better than : 17.64 vs. MNMRX (3.90).
| HBLYX | MNMRX | HBLYX / MNMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.30 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.30 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.364 | -1.065 | -34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2000 | 12,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 293M | 3,925% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.53 | 2.07 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.39 | 2.99 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.23 | 5.68 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.64 | 3.90 | 453% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.56 | 1.40 | 2,322% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...