HBUV
Price
$1.30
Change
+$0.02 (+1.56%)
Updated
Oct 30 closing price
Capitalization
25.97M
HNLGF
Price
$1.27
Change
+$0.17 (+15.45%)
Updated
Feb 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.12B
Ad is loading...

HBUV vs HNLGF

Header iconHBUV vs HNLGF Comparison
Open Charts HBUV vs HNLGFBanner chart's image
Hubilu Venture
Price$1.30
Change+$0.02 (+1.56%)
Volume$309
Capitalization25.97M
Hang Lung Group
Price$1.27
Change+$0.17 (+15.45%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization2.12B
HBUV vs HNLGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBUV vs. HNLGF commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBUV is a Hold and HNLGF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (HBUV: $1.30 vs. HNLGF: $1.27)
Brand notoriety: HBUV and HNLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBUV: 100% vs. HNLGF: 33%
Market capitalization -- HBUV: $25.97M vs. HNLGF: $2.12B
HBUV [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $25.97M. HNLGF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $2.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBUV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHNLGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HBUV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HNLGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HBUV is a better buy in the long-term than HNLGF.

Price Growth

HBUV (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HNLGF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +3.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+3.31% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HNLGF($2.12B) has a higher market cap than HBUV($26M). HBUV has higher P/E ratio than HNLGF: HBUV (131.58) vs HNLGF (5.79). HNLGF YTD gains are higher at: 15.120 vs. HBUV (0.000). HNLGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.03B vs. HBUV (1.09M). HNLGF has more cash in the bank: 5.4B vs. HBUV (88.5K). HBUV has less debt than HNLGF: HBUV (16.5M) vs HNLGF (45.2B). HNLGF has higher revenues than HBUV: HNLGF (11.2B) vs HBUV (1.6M).
HBUVHNLGFHBUV / HNLGF
Capitalization26M2.12B1%
EBITDA1.09M7.03B0%
Gain YTD0.00015.120-
P/E Ratio131.585.792,271%
Revenue1.6M11.2B0%
Total Cash88.5K5.4B0%
Total Debt16.5M45.2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBUV vs HNLGF: Fundamental Ratings
HBUV
HNLGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
52100
SMR RATING
1..100
10083
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3445
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
499
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HBUV's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as HNLGF (86). This means that HBUV’s stock grew similarly to HNLGF’s over the last 12 months.

HBUV's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HNLGF (100). This means that HBUV’s stock grew somewhat faster than HNLGF’s over the last 12 months.

HNLGF's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as HBUV (100). This means that HNLGF’s stock grew similarly to HBUV’s over the last 12 months.

HBUV's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as HNLGF (45). This means that HBUV’s stock grew similarly to HNLGF’s over the last 12 months.

HNLGF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBUV (49). This means that HNLGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBUV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QQXT96.290.71
+0.74%
First Trust NASDAQ-100 ex-Tech Sect ETF
PFUT22.970.06
+0.25%
Putnam Sustainable Future ETF
BJK40.40-0.08
-0.20%
VanEck Gaming ETF
VCLT75.96-0.17
-0.22%
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bd ETF
LIT40.75-0.22
-0.54%
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

HBUV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBUV has been loosely correlated with FHRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBUV jumps, then FHRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBUV
1D Price
Change %
HBUV100%
N/A
FHRT - HBUV
62%
Loosely correlated
+15.94%
GYRO - HBUV
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.99%
SWPFF - HBUV
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AZLCZ - HBUV
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HNLGF - HBUV
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HNLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HNLGF and HNGKY have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HNLGF and HNGKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HNLGF
1D Price
Change %
HNLGF100%
N/A
HNGKY - HNLGF
10%
Poorly correlated
-4.65%
HLPPY - HNLGF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
HGPI - HNLGF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLDCY - HNLGF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
HLPPF - HNLGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More