HCBC
Price
$30.35
Change
+$0.35 (+1.17%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
37.46M
LSFG
Price
$46.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 13 closing price
Capitalization
8.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HCBC vs LSFG

Header iconHCBC vs LSFG Comparison
Open Charts HCBC vs LSFGBanner chart's image
High Country Ban
Price$30.35
Change+$0.35 (+1.17%)
Volume$200
Capitalization37.46M
Lifestore Financial Group
Price$46.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$150
Capitalization8.41M
HCBC vs LSFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HCBC vs. LSFG commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCBC is a Hold and LSFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (HCBC: $30.35 vs. LSFG: $46.10)
Brand notoriety: HCBC and LSFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCBC: 44% vs. LSFG: 126%
Market capitalization -- HCBC: $37.46M vs. LSFG: $8.41M
HCBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $37.46M. LSFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $8.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLSFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HCBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LSFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LSFG is a better buy in the long-term than HCBC.

Price Growth

HCBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.17% price change this week, while LSFG (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.75%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.14% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCBC($37.5M) has a higher market cap than LSFG($8.41M). LSFG YTD gains are higher at: 4.181 vs. HCBC (1.977).
HCBCLSFGHCBC / LSFG
Capitalization37.5M8.41M446%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.9774.18147%
P/E Ratio8.24N/A-
Revenue20.7MN/A-
Total Cash8.37MN/A-
Total Debt5.25MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HCBC vs LSFG: Fundamental Ratings
HCBC
LSFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8646
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6316
SMR RATING
1..100
3737
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5454
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2216
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCBC's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as LSFG (38). This means that HCBC’s stock grew similarly to LSFG’s over the last 12 months.

LSFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCBC (63). This means that LSFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

LSFG's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as HCBC (37). This means that LSFG’s stock grew similarly to HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

LSFG's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as HCBC (54). This means that LSFG’s stock grew similarly to HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

LSFG's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as HCBC (22). This means that LSFG’s stock grew similarly to HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAUG22.97N/A
N/A
FT Vest U.S. Sm Cp Mod Buf ETF -Aug
CRUZ21.88N/A
N/A
Defiance Hotel Airline and Cruise ETF
UBND21.63-0.03
-0.14%
VictoryShares Core Plus Intmdt Bond ETF
FCAL47.90-0.07
-0.15%
First Trust California Muni Hi Inc ETF
SPHY23.40-0.05
-0.21%
SPDR® Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF

HCBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCBC and MCHB have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCBC and MCHB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCBC
1D Price
Change %
HCBC100%
+1.17%
MCHB - HCBC
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSBK - HCBC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
LSFG - HCBC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWG - HCBC
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
FSFG - HCBC
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
More

LSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LSFG and MCHB have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSFG and MCHB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSFG
1D Price
Change %
LSFG100%
N/A
MCHB - LSFG
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNKHF - LSFG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHT - LSFG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCFB - LSFG
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBI - LSFG
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More